Development of a general method of limited sampling for the determination of AUC for a drug that displays two-compartment pharmacokinetics

被引:7
作者
Duffull, SB
Begg, EJ
Deely, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand
[3] Univ Canterbury, Dept Math & Stat, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
limited sampling; area under the curve; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1007/s002280050620
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 [药学];
摘要
Objectives: To develop a method of limited sampling that would enable accurate estimation of the area under the concentration time curve (AUC) when using the log trapezoidal method. Methods: A series of datasets were simulated. Each dataset comprised 1000 subjects. Each subject was "administered" an intravenous bolus dose of a drug that displays two compartment pharmacokinetics. In the first series of simulations, a variety of combinations of the number of sampling times (K) and number of replicate measurements (R) at each of these times were tested, where K x R = 12 (i.e. N = 12). The times that each of the K samples were taken were chosen to be those that divided the AUC into K - 1 trapezoids of equal area. The concentration-time curves were estimated based on a priori estimates of the population parameters. The best combination of K and R was tested under various conditions of parameter variability and assay variability. The combinations were compared with a conventional sampling strategy, where N = 12, K = 12(R = 1). Results: The combination K = 4 and R = 3 proved to be the "best". It had similar accuracy to the conventional method. The best limited sampling combination was superior to the conventional method when assay variability was high (CV = 30%), was similar when assay variability was 15%, but the conventional method became statistically superior when assay variability was 7.5% or less. The accuracy of the best limited sampling combination was inversely related to the parameter variability. If K was set to 4 and R allowed to increase to 6 (i.e. N not equal 12), there was no further gain in accuracy. Conclusion: The proposed method of limited sampling is at least as accurate as the conventional intensive sampling technique, but more efficient in terms of sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 219
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY OF 2',3'-DIDEOXYINOSINE IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-INFECTED CHILDREN [J].
BALIS, FM ;
PIZZO, PA ;
BUTLER, KM ;
HAWKINS, ME ;
BROUWERS, P ;
HUSSON, RN ;
JACOBSEN, F ;
BLANEY, SM ;
GRESS, J ;
JAROSINSKI, P ;
POPLACK, DG .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1992, 165 (01) :99-104
[2]
OPTIMAL SAMPLING TIMES FOR PHARMACOKINETIC EXPERIMENTS [J].
DARGENIO, DZ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1981, 9 (06) :739-756
[3]
DELL RB, 1985, J LIPID RES, V26, P575
[4]
Clinical pharmacokinetics and dose optimisation of carboplatin [J].
Duffull, SB ;
Robinson, BA .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 33 (03) :161-183
[5]
EGORIN MJ, 1989, CANCER RES, V49, P3129
[6]
METHOTREXATE IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - A LIMITED SAMPLING STRATEGY FOR ESTIMATION OF THE AREA UNDER THE PLASMA-CONCENTRATION VERSUS TIME CURVE [J].
EKSBORG, S ;
ALBERTIONI, F ;
BECK, O ;
PETERSON, C ;
SEIDEMAN, P .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1994, 16 (06) :560-563
[7]
INTERPRETATION OF SIMULATION STUDIES FOR EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS [J].
ETTE, EI ;
KELMAN, AW ;
HOWIE, CA ;
WHITING, B .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1993, 27 (09) :1034-1039
[8]
A single sample assay for the estimation of the area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve [J].
GhazalAswad, S ;
Calvert, AH ;
Newell, DR .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 37 (05) :429-434
[9]
Landaw E., 1985, VARIABILITY DRUG THE, P187
[10]
A LIMITED SAMPLING PROCEDURE FOR ESTIMATING ADRIAMYCIN PHARMACOKINETICS IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
LAUNAY, MC ;
MILANO, G ;
ILIADIS, A ;
FRENAY, M ;
NAMER, N .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 60 (01) :89-92