Assessing the cost effectiveness of robotics in urological surgery - a systematic review

被引:81
作者
Ahmed, Kamran [1 ]
Ibrahim, Amel [1 ]
Wang, Tim T. [1 ]
Khan, Nuzhath [1 ]
Challacombe, Ben [1 ]
Khan, Muhammed Shamim [1 ]
Dasgupta, Prokar [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Urol, Guys Hosp, MRC Ctr Transplantat, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
robotics; urology; healthcare economics; training; outcomes; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11015.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学]; 100221 [泌尿外科学];
摘要
OBJECTIVES Although robotic technology is becoming increasingly popular for urological procedures, barriers to its widespread dissemination include cost and the lack of long term outcomes. This systematic review analyzed studies comparing the use of robotic with laparoscopic and open urological surgery. These three procedures were assessed for cost efficiency in the form of direct as well as indirect costs that could arise from length of surgery, hospital stay, complications, learning curve and postoperative outcomes. METHODS A systematic review was performed searching Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers identified abstracts using online databases and independently reviewed full length papers suitable for inclusion in the study. RESULTS Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy are superior with respect to reduced hospital stay (range 1-1.76 days and 1-5.5 days, respectively) and blood loss (range 482-780 mL and 227-234 mL, respectively) when compared with the open approach (range 2-8 days and 1015 mL). Robot assisted radical prostatectomy remains more expensive (total cost ranging from US $2000-$39 215) than both laparoscopic (range US $740-$29 771) and open radical prostatectomy (range US $1870-$31 518). This difference is due to the cost of robot purchase, maintenance and instruments. The reduced length of stay in hospital (range 1-1.5 days) and length of surgery (range 102-360 min) are unable to compensate for the excess costs. Robotic surgery may require a smaller learning curve (20-40 cases) although the evidence is inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery provides similar postoperative outcomes to laparoscopic surgery but a reduced learning curve. Although costs are currently high, increased competition from manufacturers and wider dissemination of the technology could drive down costs. Further trials are needed to evaluate long term outcomes in order to evaluate fully the value of all three procedures in urological surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1544 / 1556
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Woo, D ;
Eichel, L ;
Lee, DI ;
Edwards, R ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (05) :819-822
[2]
Current status of robotic assisted pelvic surgery and future developments [J].
Ahmed, Kamran ;
Khan, Mohammad Shamim ;
Vats, Amit ;
Nagpal, Kamal ;
Priest, Oliver ;
Patel, Vanash ;
Vecht, Joshua A. ;
Ashrafian, Hutan ;
Yang, Guang-Zhong ;
Athanasiou, Thanos ;
Darzi, Ara .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 7 (05) :431-440
[3]
[Anonymous], UROLOGIC ROBOTIC SUR
[4]
[Anonymous], OXF CTR EV BAS
[5]
[Anonymous], UROLOGIC ROBOTIC SUR
[6]
[Anonymous], OXFORD CENTRE FOR EV
[7]
New Technology and Health Care Costs - The Case of Robot-Assisted Surgery [J].
Barbash, Gabriel I. ;
Glied, Sherry A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (08) :701-704
[8]
Becker Cinda, 2008, Mod Healthc, V38, P6
[9]
Cost Comparison of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer [J].
Bolenz, Christian ;
Gupta, Amit ;
Hotze, Timothy ;
Ho, Richard ;
Cadeddu, Jeffrey A. ;
Roehrborn, Claus G. ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (03) :453-458
[10]
Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy [J].
Burgess, Scott V. ;
Atug, Fatih ;
Castle, Erik P. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Thomas, Raju .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (10) :827-830