Dissociation of attentional processes in patients with focal frontal and posterior lesions

被引:97
作者
Stuss, DT
Toth, JP
Franchi, D
Alexander, MP
Tipperd, S
Craik, FIM
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Baycrest Ctr Geriatr Care, Rotman Res Inst, Toronto, ON M6A 2E1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Clarke Inst Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Univ Wales, Sch Psychol, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
attention; interference; inhibition of return; negative priming; task complexity;
D O I
10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00158-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A location-based ('select-what, respond-where') priming task was used to examine three measures of selective attention (interference (INT), negative priming (NP), and inhibition of return (IOR)) as a function of focal brain pathology and the complexity of target selection. Control subjects showed different patterns of performance for the three attentional measures as a function of complexity, suggesting some independence among INT, NP, and IOR. Brain-damaged subjects showed significant response slowing, as well as a number of lesion-specific attentional abnormalities. Right frontal (including bifrontal) damage resulted in proportionally increased interference related to task complexity. Left posterior damage increased IOR in the most complex task, while left frontal damage reversed the control pattern of IOR as a function of complexity. Right hemisphere (right posterior and right frontal damage) pathology resulted in a virtual loss of negative priming at all levels of task complexity; left and bifrontal damage resulted in diminished NP only related to increases in the complexity of selection. INT, NP, and IOR are mediated by different brain regions and their expression can be modulated by the complexity of the selection task. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1027
页数:23
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   FRONTAL LOBES AND LANGUAGE [J].
ALEXANDER, MP ;
BENSON, DF ;
STUSS, DT .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1989, 37 (04) :656-691
[2]   EFFECTS OF FRONTAL OR TEMPORAL LOBECTOMY ON THE USE OF ADVANCE INFORMATION IN A CHOICE REACTION-TIME TASK [J].
ALIVISATOS, B ;
MILNER, B .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1989, 27 (04) :495-503
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY MENT
[4]   Exploring the central executive [J].
Baddeley, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (01) :5-28
[5]  
CERELLA J, 1994, J GERONTOL B-PSYCHOL, V49, P65
[6]   DISSOCIATED NEGLECT BEHAVIOR FOLLOWING SEQUENTIAL STROKES IN THE RIGHT-HEMISPHERE [J].
DAFFNER, KR ;
AHERN, GL ;
WEINTRAUB, S ;
MESULAM, MM .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1990, 28 (01) :97-101
[7]   The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex [J].
Damasio, AR .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 351 (1346) :1413-1420
[8]   THE NATURE OF APRAXIA [J].
DENNYBROWN, D .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1958, 126 (01) :9-32
[9]   DEMONSTRATION OF CAPACITY LIMITATION [J].
DUNCAN, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (01) :75-96
[10]   A RESOURCE ACCOUNT OF INHIBITION [J].
ENGLE, RW ;
CONWAY, ARA ;
TUHOLSKI, SW ;
SHISLER, RJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (02) :122-125