Efficient nonlinear predictive error variance for highly parameterized models

被引:33
作者
Tonkin, Matthew
Doherty, John
Moore, Catherine
机构
[1] SS Papadopulos & Assoc Inc, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Civil Engn, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Watermark Numer Comp, Corinda 4075, Australia
[4] Lincoln Univ, Lincoln Ventures Ltd, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006WR005348
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Predictive error variance analysis attempts to determine how wrong predictions made by a calibrated model may be. Predictive error variance analysis is usually undertaken following calibration using a small number of parameters defined through a priori parsimony. In contrast, we introduce a method for investigating the potential error in predictions made by highly parameterized models calibrated using regularized inversion. Vecchia and Cooley (1987) describe a method of predictive error variance analysis that is constrained by calibration data. We extend this approach to include constraints on parameters that lie within the calibration null space. These constraints are determined by dividing parameter space into combinations of parameters for which estimates can be obtained and those for which they cannot. This enables the contribution to predictive error variance from parameterization simplifications required to solve the inverse problem to be quantified, in addition to the contribution from measurement noise. We also describe a novel technique that restricts the analysis to a strategically defined predictive solution subspace, enabling an approximate predictive error variance analysis to be completed efficiently. The method is illustrated using a synthetic and a real-world groundwater flow and transport model.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MODFLOW 2000 US GEOL
[2]  
Aster R. C., 2005, PARAMETER ESTIMATION
[3]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[4]   Inverse problem in hydrogeology [J].
Carrera, J ;
Alcolea, A ;
Medina, A ;
Hidalgo, J ;
Slooten, LJ .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 13 (01) :206-222
[5]   ESTIMATION OF AQUIFER PARAMETERS UNDER TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS .2. UNIQUENESS, STABILITY, AND SOLUTION ALGORITHMS [J].
CARRERA, J ;
NEUMAN, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (02) :211-227
[6]   ESTIMATION OF AQUIFER PARAMETERS UNDER TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS .1. MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD METHOD INCORPORATING PRIOR INFORMATION [J].
CARRERA, J ;
NEUMAN, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (02) :199-210
[7]   APPLICATION OF THE PILOT POINT METHOD TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITIES [J].
CERTES, C ;
DEMARSILY, G .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1991, 14 (05) :284-300
[8]   Evaluation of prediction intervals for expressing uncertainties in groundwater flow model predictions [J].
Christensen, S ;
Cooley, RL .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (09) :2627-2639
[9]   Bias and uncertainty in regression-calibrated models of groundwater flow in heterogeneous media [J].
Cooley, RL ;
Christensen, S .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2006, 29 (05) :639-656
[10]  
COOLEY RL, 2004, US GEOL SURV, V1679