Decisions about critical events in device-related scenarios as a function of expertise

被引:12
作者
Laxmisan, A
Malhotra, S
Keselman, A
Johnson, TR
Patel, VL
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Lab Decis Making & Cognit, Dept Biomed Informat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Hlth Informat Sci, Houston, TX USA
关键词
decision making; devices; critical care collaborative decision making; patient safety; individual/group expertise; task analysis; institutional decision making;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.012
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper presents the perspectives of personnel involved in decision-making about devices in critical care. We use the concept of "sharp and blunt ends" of practice to describe the performance of health care professionals. The "sharp end" is physically and temporally close to the system; the "blunt end" is removed from the system in time and space and yet affects the system through indirect influence on the sharp end. In this study, the sharp end is represented by the clinicians (nurses and doctors) and the blunt end by the administrators and biomedical engineers. These subjects represent the professionals involved in the decision-making process for purchasing biomedical equipment for the hospital. They were asked to "think aloud" while evaluating three error scenarios based on real events. The responses were recorded and transcribed for analysis. The results show differences in interpretation of critical events as a function of professional expertise. The clinicians (sharp-end practitioners) focused on clinical and human aspect of errors while the biomedical engineers focused on device-related errors. The administrators focused on documentation and training. These different interpretations mean that the problems are represented differently by these groups of subjects, and these representations result in variable decisions about devices. These results are discussed within a systems approach framework to help us assess the completeness of the problem representations of the subjects, their awareness of critical events, and how these events would collectively contribute to the occurrence of error. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 212
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, HUMAN ERROR MED
[2]   Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach [J].
Berg, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1999, 55 (02) :87-101
[3]  
BOGDEN R, 1992, QUALITATIVE RES ED I
[4]  
BOGNER MS, 1994, ERROR MED, pCH1
[5]  
Cole M., 1997, MIND CULTURE ACTIVIT
[6]  
Committee on quality of health care in America-Institute of Medicine, 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[7]   PREVENTABLE ANESTHESIA MISHAPS - STUDY OF HUMAN-FACTORS [J].
COOPER, JB ;
MCPEEK, B ;
LONG, CD ;
NEWBOWER, RS .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1978, 49 (06) :399-406
[8]   HINDSIGHT NOT EQUAL TO FORESIGHT - EFFECT OF OUTCOME KNOWLEDGE ON JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1975, 1 (03) :288-299
[9]  
Fiske S.X., 1984, Social cognition
[10]  
Grant L, 1998, Health Serv J, V108, P34