Sources of Differences in On-Orbital Total Solar Irradiance Measurements and Description of a Proposed Laboratory Intercomparison

被引:29
作者
Butler, J. J. [1 ]
Johnson, B. C. [2 ]
Rice, J. P. [2 ]
Shirley, E. L. [2 ]
Barnes, R. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD USA
[2] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[3] SAIC, Beltsville, MD USA
关键词
absolute radiometric calibration; diffraction calculations; total solar irradiance (TSI); TSI uncertainty; TSI workshop; on-orbital TSI differences;
D O I
10.6028/jres.113.014
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
There is a 5 W/m(2) (about 0.35 %) difference between current on-orbit Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) measurements. On 18-20 July 2005, a workshop was held at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, Maryland that focused on understanding possible reasons for this difference, through an examination of the instrument designs, calibration approaches, and appropriate measurement equations. The instruments studied in that workshop included the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor III (ACRIM III) on the Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor SATellite (ACRIMSAT), the Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) on the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE), the Variability of solar IRradiance and Gravity Oscillations (VIRGO) on the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO), and the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) on the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite (ERBS). Presentations for each instrument included descriptions of its design, its measurement equation and uncertainty budget, and the methods used to assess on-orbit degradation. The workshop also included a session on satellite- and ground-based instrument comparisons and a session on laboratory-based comparisons and the application of new laboratory comparison techniques. The workshop has led to investigations of the effects of diffraction and of aperture area measurements on the differences between instruments. In addition, a laboratory-based instrument comparison is proposed that uses optical power measurements (with lasers that underfill the apertures of the TSI instruments), irradiance measurements (with lasers that overfill the apertures of the TSI instrument), and a cryogenic electrical substitution radiometer as a standard for comparing the instruments. A summary of the workshop and an overview of the proposed research efforts are presented here.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 203
页数:17
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
BUTLER JJ, 2005, EXPT METHODS PHYS SC, V41, pCH10
[2]   Geometric area measurements of circular apertures for radiometry at NIST [J].
Fowler, J ;
Litorja, M .
METROLOGIA, 2003, 40 (01) :S9-S12
[3]  
FOX NP, 2005, EXPT METHODS PHYS SC, V41, pCH2
[4]  
FROHLICH C, 2005, COMMUNICATION OCT
[5]   Final report on the subsequent bilateral comparison of cryogenic radiometers CCPR-S3 between the BIPM and the IEN [J].
Goebel, R. ;
Stock, M. .
METROLOGIA, 2003, 40
[6]  
Hengstberger F., 1989, Absolute Radiometry: Electrical Calibrated Thermal Detectors of Optical Radiation
[7]   Beam shaping with a piano-aspheric lens pair [J].
Hoffnagle, JA ;
Jefferson, CM .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 42 (11) :3090-3099
[8]   NIST reference cryogenic radiometer designed for versatile performance [J].
Houston, JM ;
Rice, JP .
METROLOGIA, 2006, 43 (02) :S31-S35
[9]  
JOHNSON BC, 2008, RESULTS APERTU UNPUB
[10]  
LITORJA M, P SPIE, V6677