Influence of volume and specialization on survival following surgery for colorectal cancer

被引:113
作者
McArdle, CS
Hole, DJ
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Royal Infirm, Dept Surg, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Dept Publ Hlth, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4476
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Previous studies have shown that significant surgeon-related differences in survival exist following surgery for colorectal cancer. It is not clear whether these differences were due to differences in caseload or degree of specialization. Methods. Outcome in 3200 patients who underwent resection for colorectal cancer between 1991 and 1994 was analysed on the basis of caseload and degree of specialization of individual surgeons. Five-year survival rates, and the corresponding hazard ratios adjusted for case mix, were calculated. Results: Cancer-specific survival rate at 5 years following curative resection varied among surgeons from 53.4 to 84.6 per cent; the adjusted hazard ratios varied from 0.48 to 1.55. Cancer-specific survival rate at 5 years following curative resection was 70.2, 62.0 and 65.9 per cent for surgeons with a high, medium and low case volume respectively. There were no consistent differences in the adjusted hazard ratios by volume. Cancer-specific survival rate at 5 years following curative resection was 72.7 per cent for those treated by specialists and 63.8 per cent for those treated by non-specialists; the adjusted hazard ratio for non-specialists was 1.35 (95 per cent confidence interval 1.13 to 1.62; P = 0.001). Conclusion. The differences in outcome following apparently curative resection for colorectal cancer among surgeons appear to reflect the degree of specialization rather than case volume. It is likely that increased specialization will lead to further improvements in survival.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 617
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[2]   LOTHIAN AND BORDERS LARGE-BOWEL CANCER PROJECT - IMMEDIATE OUTCOME AFTER SURGERY - THE CONSULTANT SURGEONS AND PATHOLOGISTS OF THE LOTHIAN AND BORDERS HEALTH BOARDS [J].
CARTER, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (07) :888-890
[3]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[4]   ANASTOMOTIC INTEGRITY AFTER OPERATIONS FOR LARGE-BOWEL CANCER - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
FIELDING, LP ;
STEWARTBROWN, S ;
BLESOVSKY, L ;
KEARNEY, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1980, 281 (6237) :411-414
[5]   Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia [J].
Gillison, EW ;
Powell, J ;
Mcconkey, CC ;
Spychal, RT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (03) :344-348
[6]   Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection [J].
Harmon, JW ;
Tang, DG ;
Gordon, TA ;
Bowman, HM ;
Choti, MA ;
Kaufman, HS ;
Bender, JS ;
Duncan, MD ;
Magnuson, TH ;
Lillemoe, KD ;
Cameron, JL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :404-411
[7]  
HERMANEK P, 1995, TUMORI, V81, P60
[8]   Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer [J].
Hodgson, DC ;
Fuchs, CS ;
Ayanian, JZ .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (07) :501-515
[9]   Trends in survival from colonic cancer: The impact of subspecialization [J].
Hoffmann, D ;
Moore, J ;
Roder, D .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 67 (12) :842-845
[10]   Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer [J].
Hole, DJ ;
McArdle, CS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2002, 89 (05) :586-590