Reference transmission network: A game theory approach

被引:25
作者
Minoia, A [1 ]
Ernst, D
Dicorato, M
Trovato, M
Ilic, M
机构
[1] Edison Trading SpA, I-20121 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Liege, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[3] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Elettrotecn & Elettron, I-70125 Bari, Italy
[4] Carnegie Mellon Univ, CEE, EPP, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
game theory; optimal network; strategic bidding; transmission planning;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2005.861966
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 [电气工程]; 0809 [电子科学与技术];
摘要
The transmission network plays a key role in an oligopolistic electricity market. In fact, the capacity of a transmission network determines the degree to which the generators in different locations compete with others and could also greatly influence the strategic behaviors of market participants. In such an oligopolistic framework, different agents may have distinct and sometimes opposite interests in urging or hindering certain transmission expansions. Therefore, the regulatory authority, starting from the existing grid, faces the challenge of defining an optimal network upgrade to be used as benchmark for approval or rejection of a given transmission expansion. The aim of this paper is to define the concept of reference transmission network (RTN) from an economic point of view and to provide a tool for the RTN assessment in a deregulated framework where strategic behaviors are likely to appear. A general game-theoretic model for the RTN evaluation is presented, and the solution procedure is discussed. The strategic behavior of market agents in the spot market is modeled according to a Supply Function Equilibrium approach. The impact of transmission capacity expansion on market participants' strategic behavior is studied on a three-bus test network. The RTN is computed and compared with the optimal expansion found when perfect competition among power producers is assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 259
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
Transmission expansion planning: A mixed-integer LP approach [J].
Alguacil, N ;
Motto, AL ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (03) :1070-1077
[2]
Theory and application of linear supply function equilibrium in electricity markets [J].
Baldick, R ;
Grant, R ;
Kahn, E .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2004, 25 (02) :143-167
[3]
Electricity market equilibrium models: The effect of parametrization [J].
Baldick, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (04) :1170-1176
[4]
TRANSMISSION PLANNING ISSUES IN A COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC-ENVIRONMENT [J].
BALDICK, R ;
KAHN, E .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1993, 8 (04) :1497-1503
[5]
Berry C. A., 1999, Utilities Policy, V8, P139, DOI 10.1016/S0957-1787(99)00016-8
[6]
A new benders decomposition approach to solve power transmission network design problems [J].
Binato, S ;
Pereira, MVF ;
Granville, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (02) :235-240
[7]
PEAK-LOAD PRICING [J].
BOITEUX, M .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1960, 33 (02) :157-179
[8]
The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industry [J].
Borenstein, S ;
Bushnell, J ;
Stoft, S .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 31 (02) :294-325
[9]
Centralized vs. competitive transmission expansion planning: The need for new tools [J].
Cagigas, C ;
Madrigal, M .
2003 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :1012-1017
[10]
Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks [J].
Cardell, JB ;
Hitt, CC ;
Hogan, WW .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1997, 19 (1-2) :109-137