Slow diffusion of renewable energy technologies in China: An empirical analysis from the perspective of innovation system

被引:43
作者
Chen, Yufang [1 ]
Lin, Boqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Sch Management, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Fujian 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
Technological diffusion; Renewable energy technologies; Innovation system; Two-part model; Fixed-effect Tobit model; WIND POWER; IMPACT; ELECTRICITY; CHALLENGES; SELECTION; POLICIES; MODELS; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121186
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Renewable energy is particularly important for achieving energy security and emission reduction targets. However, China's renewable energy technologies are still diffusing slowly. Based on the two-part model and the fixed-effect Tobit model, this paper investigates the factors affecting the diffusion of renewable energy technologies in 28 provinces in China between 2006 and 2017 from the perspective of an innovation system. It is found that increasing the renewable energy tariff surcharge subsidy, the share of relevant employees, and grid density will drive the diffusion of renewable energy technologies. Reducing the share of coal consumption will increase the probability of adoption of renewable energy technologies. Furthermore, a certain province's or other provinces' renewable energy technology patent stocks both provide the knowledge infrastructure for the increase in the share of renewable energy generation. In contrast, the crowding-out effect of foreign direct investment will hinder the expansion of renewable energy generation share. Therefore, the failures in the six aspects of institutional design, market structure, personnel factor, external interaction, knowledge infrastructure, and physical infrastructure, will lead to the slow diffusion of renewable energy technologies. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]
Time to get ready: Conceptualizing the temporal and spatial dynamics of formative phases for energy technologies [J].
Bento, Nuno ;
Wilson, Charlie ;
Anadon, Laura Diaz .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 :282-293
[2]
Estimating the political, economic and environmental factors' impact on the installed wind capacity development: A system GMM approach [J].
Biresselioglu, Mehmet Efe ;
Kilinc, Dilara ;
Onater-Isberk, Esra ;
Yelkenci, Tezer .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 96 :636-644
[3]
[4]
Does FDI have energy-saving spillover effect in China? A perspective of energy-biased technical change [J].
Dong, Yixuan ;
Shao, Shuai ;
Zhang, Yan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 234 :436-450
[5]
Dow W., 2003, Health Services Outcome Research Methodology, V4, P5
[6]
Duan N., 1984, J BUS ECON STAT, V2, P283, DOI [10.1080/07350015.1984.10509396, DOI 10.1080/07350015.1984.10509396]
[7]
Renewable energy diffusion in Asia: Can it happen without government support? [J].
Dulal, Hari Bansha ;
Shah, Kalim U. ;
Sapkota, Chandan ;
Uma, Gengaiah ;
Kandel, Bibek R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 59 :301-311
[8]
Geographical proximity and renewable energy diffusion: An empirical approach [J].
Fadly, Dalia ;
Fontes, Francisco .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 :422-435
[9]
UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures [J].
Foxon, TJ ;
Gross, R ;
Chase, A ;
Howes, J ;
Arnall, A ;
Anderson, D .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (16) :2123-2137
[10]
Driving for fun? Comparing the effect of fuel prices on weekday and weekend fuel consumption [J].
Frondel, Manuel ;
Vance, Colin .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (01) :102-109