Foreign material in postoperative adhesions

被引:200
作者
Luijendijk, RW
deLange, DCD
Wauters, CCAP
Hop, WCJ
Duron, JJ
Pailer, JL
Camprodon, BR
Holmdahl, L
vanGeldorp, HJ
Jeekel, J
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT GEN SURG,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT PATHOL,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[3] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[4] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT GYNECOL,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
[5] GRP HOSP PITIE SALPETRIERE,DEPT GEN SURG,F-75634 PARIS,FRANCE
[6] HOP INSTRUCT ARMEES VAL DE GRACE,DEPT GEN SURG,PARIS,FRANCE
[7] HOSP ESPERANZA,DEPT GEN SURG,BARCELONA,SPAIN
[8] GOTHENBURG UNIV,OSTRA HOSP,DEPT GEN SURG,S-41685 GOTHENBURG,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-199603000-00003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective The authors determined the prevalence of foreign body granulomas in intra-abdominal adhesions in patients with a history of abdominal surgery. Patients and Methods In a cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational study, adult patients with a history of one or more previous abdominal operations and scheduled for laparotomy between 1991 and 1993 were examined during surgery. Patients in whom adhesions were present were selected for study. Quantity, distribution, and quality of adhesions were scored, and adhesion samples were taken for histologic examination. Results In 448 studied patients, the adhesions were most frequently attached to the omentum (68%) and the small bowel (67%). The amount of adhesions was significantly smaller in patients with a history of only one minor operation or one major operation, compared with those with multiple laparotomies (p < 0.001). Significantly more adhesions were found in patients with a history of adhesions at previous laparotomy (p < 0.001), with presence of abdominal abscess, hematoma, and intestinal leakage as complications after former surgery (p = 0.01, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), and with a history of an unoperated inflammatory process (p = 0.04). Granulomas were found in 26% of all patients. Suture granulomas were found in 25% of the patients. Starch granulomas were present in 5% of the operated patients whose surgeons wore starch-containing gloves. When suture granulomas were present, the median interval between the present and the most recent previous laparotomy was 13 months. When suture granulomas were absent, this interval was significantly longer-i.e., 30 months (p = 0.002). The percentage of patients with suture granulomas decreased gradually from 37% if the previous laparotomy had occurred up to 6 months before the present operation, to 18% ii the previous laparotomy had occurred more than 2 years ago (p < 0.001). Conclusions The number of adhesions found at laparotomy was significantly larger in patients with a history of multiple laparotomies, unoperated intra-abdominal inflammatory disease, and previous postoperative intra-abdominal complications, and when adhesions were already present at previous laparotomy. In recent adhesions, suture granulomas occurred in a large percentage. This suggests that the intra-abdominal presence of foreign material is an important cause of adhesion formation. Therefore intra-abdominal contamination with foreign material should be minimized.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 248
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   PERITONEAL ADHESIONS - CAUSES AND PREVENTION [J].
ALMDAHL, SM ;
BURHOL, PG .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 1990, 8 (01) :37-44
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Analysis of binary data
[3]   SIGNIFICANCE OF STARCH POWDER CONTAMINATION IN ETIOLOGY OF PERITONEAL ADHESIONS [J].
COOKE, SAR ;
HAMILTON, DG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1977, 64 (06) :410-412
[4]  
COX KR, 1979, BRIT J SURG, V57, P650
[5]   HISTOPATHOLOGY OF PERITONEAL STARCH GRANULOMAS [J].
DAVIES, JD ;
NEELY, J .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1972, 107 (04) :265-+
[6]   DO SURGICAL PACKS CAUSE PERITONEAL ADHESIONS [J].
DOWN, RHL ;
WHITEHEAD, R ;
WATTS, JM .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1979, 49 (03) :379-382
[7]  
ELKINS TE, 1987, OBSTET GYNECOL, V70, P225
[8]   THE CAUSES AND PREVENTION OF INTESTINAL ADHESIONS [J].
ELLIS, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (05) :241-243
[9]  
ELLIS H, 1971, SURG GYNECOL OBSTETR, V133, P497
[10]  
ELLIS H, 1990, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V171, P521