Comparing safety analysis techniques

被引:61
作者
Rouvroye, JL [1 ]
van den Bliek, EG [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
IEC61508; standards; quantification of safety; analysis techniques;
D O I
10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00116-8
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In process industry Safety Instrumented Systems ISIS) and Emergency Shutdown Systems (ESD) are very important for the management/ reduction of risk. In new standards (e.g. Ref. [1]) on functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems a quantification of the achieved safety is often required. These new standards do not prescribe how to calculate the achieved safety. Only guidelines and recommendations are given. The problem with this approach is that all kinds of different analysis techniques will be used and in industry the results of the analysis will be compared. These different analysis techniques all use different methodologies and assumptions, which implies that the results may not be comparable. In this paper an approach for comparing different analysis techniques and the qualitative and quantitative results from this comparison are described. The author suggests that, because of the differences in the analysis techniques, one analysis technique is to be preferred. The Enhanced Markov Analysis technique, described in this paper, could be used for this purpose because it covers most aspects relevant for quantification of safety. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AARO R, 1989, RELIABILITY PREDICTI
[2]  
*AICHE CCPS, 1993, GUID SAF AUT CHEM PR
[3]  
*DIN MSR, 1992, 19251 DIN MSR
[4]  
*DIN V, 1994, 19250 DIN V
[5]  
*DIN V VDE, 1990, 0801 DIN V VDE
[6]  
*DIN V VDE, 1994, 0801 DIN V VDE A1
[7]  
*E PES INSTR SOC A, 1996, DTR84002 E PES INSTR
[8]  
GOBLE WM, 1998, EVALUATING CONTROL S
[9]  
HOUTERMANS M, 1996, P 15 INT C COMP SAF
[10]  
HOUTERMANS MJM, 1996, P PROB SAF ASS MAN C