The depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study

被引:103
作者
Neuhaus, Chris [1 ]
Neuhaus, Ellen [1 ]
Asher, Alan [1 ]
Wrede, Clint [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ No Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/pla.2006.0026
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The introduction of Google Scholar in November 2004 was accompanied by fanfare, skepticism, and numerous questions about the scope and coverage of this database. Nearly one year after its inception, many of these questions remain unanswered. This study compares the contents of 47 different databases with that of Google Scholar. Included in this investigation are tests for Google Scholar publication date and publication language bias, as well as a study of upload frequency. Tests show Google Scholar's current strengths to be coverage of science and medical databases, open access databases, and single publisher databases. Current weaknesses include lack of coverage of social science and humanities databases and an English language bias.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:15
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Google scholar: A source for clinicians? [J].
Henderson, J .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (12) :1549-1550
[2]   Google Scholar:: the pros and the cons [J].
Jacsó, P .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2005, 29 (02) :208-214
[3]  
JACSO P, 2005, SIDE BY SIE2 NATIVE
[4]  
JASCO, 2004, PETERS DIGITAL REFER
[5]  
MARKOFF J, 2004, NY TIMES 1118
[6]  
MYHILL M, 2005, CHARLESTON ADVISOR, V6
[7]  
Tenopir C, 2005, LIBR J, V130, P32
[8]  
Wleklinski JM, 2005, ONLINE, V29, P22
[9]  
YOUNG JR, 2004, CHRONICLE HIGHE 1203, pA34
[10]  
YOUNG JR, 2005, CHRONICLE HIGHE 0520, pA30