Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens

被引:222
作者
Cronin, Matthew A. [1 ]
Gonzalez, Cleotilde [2 ]
Sterman, John D. [3 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Sch Management, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Dynam Decis Making Lab, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] MIT Sloan Sch Management, Syst Dynam Grp, Cambridge, MA 02141 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Dynamic decision making; Cognitive capacity; Accumulation; Stocks and flows; System dynamics; DYNAMIC DECISION-MAKING; ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN; FEEDBACK; TASK; SYSTEMS; MISPERCEPTIONS; INFORMATION; PERSPECTIVE; BLOCKS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Accumulation is a fundamental process in dynamic systems: inventory accumulates production less shipments; the national debt accumulates the federal deficit. Effective decision making in such systems requires an understanding of the relationship between stocks and the flows that alter them. However, highly educated people are often unable to infer the behavior of simple stock-flow systems. In a series of experiments we demonstrate that poor understanding of accumulation, termed stock-flow failure, is a fundamental reasoning error. Persistent poor performance is not attributable to an inability to interpret graphs, lack of contextual knowledge, motivation, or cognitive capacity. Rather, stock-flow failure is a robust phenomenon that appears to be rooted in failure to appreciate the most basic principles of accumulation, leading to the use of inappropriate heuristics. We show that many people, including highly educated individuals with strong technical training, use what we term the "correlation heuristic", erroneously assuming that the behavior of a stock matches the pattern of its flows. We discuss the origins of stock-flow failure and implications for management and education. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 130
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Reasoning versus text processing in the Wason selection task: A nondeontic perspective on perspective effects [J].
Almor, A ;
Sloman, SA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (06) :1060-1070
[2]   The effects of feedback format on dynamic decision making [J].
Atkins, PWB ;
Wood, RE ;
Rutgers, PJ .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 88 (02) :587-604
[3]   Spurious correlations in mathematical thinking [J].
Ben-Zeev, T ;
Star, JR .
COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 2001, 19 (03) :253-275
[4]  
Berry J.S., 2003, J MATH BEHAV, V22, P481, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JMATHB.2003.09.006
[5]  
Brehmer B., 1990, INSIGHTS DECISION MA, P262
[6]  
Brehmer Berndt., 1995, COMPLEX PROBLEM SOLV
[7]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[8]   Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study [J].
Carlson, M ;
Jacobs, S ;
Coe, E ;
Larsen, S ;
Hsu, E .
JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2002, 33 (05) :352-378
[9]   CATEGORIZATION AND REPRESENTATION OF PHYSICS PROBLEMS BY EXPERTS AND NOVICES [J].
CHI, MTH ;
FELTOVICH, PJ ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1981, 5 (02) :121-152
[10]   Understanding the building blocks of dynamic systems [J].
Cronin, Matthew A. ;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde .
SYSTEM DYNAMICS REVIEW, 2007, 23 (01) :1-17