Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in France

被引:63
作者
Bergeron, Christine [1 ]
Largeron, Nathalie [2 ]
McAllister, Ruth [3 ]
Mathevet, Patrice [4 ,5 ]
Remy, Vanessa [2 ]
机构
[1] Lab Pasteur Cerba, F-95066 Cergy Pontoise, France
[2] Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Market Serv, F-69367 Lyon 07, France
[3] Mapi Values Ltd, Market Access Dept, Macclesfield SK10 5JB, Cheshire, England
[4] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Gynecol, F-69003 Lyon, France
[5] Hop Edouard Herriot, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, F-69003 Lyon, France
关键词
cost-effectiveness; human papillomavirus; vaccination; cervical cancer screening;
D O I
10.1017/S0266462307080026
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: A vaccine to prevent diseases due to human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 is now available in France. The objective of this study was to assess the health and economic impact in France of implementing a quadrivalent HPV vaccine alongside existing screening practices versus screening alone. Methods: A Markov model of the natural history of HPV infection incorporating screening and vaccination, was adapted to the French context. A vaccine that would prevent 100 percent of HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18-associated diseases, with lifetime duration and 80 percent coverage, given to girls at age 14 in conjunction with current screening was compared with screening alone. Results were analyzed from both a direct healthcare cost perspective (DCP) and a third-party payer perspective (TPP). Indirect costs such as productivity loss were not taken into account in this analysis. Results: The incremental cost per life-year gained from vaccination was (sic)12,429 (TPP) and (sic)20,455 (DCP). The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for the introduction of HPV vaccination alongside the French cervical cancer screening program was (sic)8,408 (TPP) and (sic)13,809 (DICIP). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that cost-effectiveness was stable, but was most sensitive to the discount rate used for costs and benefits. Conclusions: Considering the commonly accepted threshold of (sic)50,000 per QALY, these analyses support the fact that adding a quadrivalent HPV vaccine to the current screening program in France is a cost-effective strategy for reducing the burden of cervical cancer, precancerous lesions, and genital warts caused by HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PRAT FROTT CERV DEP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GLOBOCAN 2002 CANC I
[3]   Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia [J].
Arbyn, M ;
Buntinx, F ;
Van Ranst, M ;
Paraskevaidis, E ;
Martin-Hirsch, P ;
Dillner, J .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (04) :280-293
[4]  
Arveux P, 2007, B CANCER, V94, P219
[5]  
Auquier P, 2003, FRENCH GUIDELINES EC
[6]  
*AV COM TECHN VACC, 2007, SECT MAL TRANSM REL, P6
[7]  
Bergeron C, 2006, Gynecol Obstet Fertil, V34, P1036, DOI 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.09.005
[8]   The discount rate in the economic evaluation of prevention: a thought experiment [J].
Bonneux, L ;
Birnie, E .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (02) :123-125
[9]   Discounting health effects in pharmacoeconomic evaluations: Current controversies [J].
Bos, JM ;
Postma, MJ ;
Annemans, L .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2005, 23 (07) :639-649
[10]   Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 1995 [J].
Bray, F ;
Sankila, R ;
Ferlay, J ;
Parkin, DM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (01) :99-166