Discussing adjuvant cancer therapy

被引:74
作者
Leighl, N
Gattellari, M
Butow, P
Brown, R
Tattersall, MHN
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Med Psychol Unit, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Canc Med, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1768
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To document the adequacy of patient information in oncology consultations concerning adjuvant therapy and explore predictors of physician com munication patterns, treatment decisions, patient information recall, and satisfaction. Patients and Methods: Retrospective analysis of audiotapes and verbatim transcripts of 101 initial adjuvant therapy consultations with medical and radiation oncologists was undertaken. Content analysis, data on communication patterns, treatment decisions, patient anxiety, satisfaction, and information recall were collected. Predictors of physician communication, treatment decisions, recall, and satisfaction with the consultation were identified. Results: The majority of patients were well informed of their prognosis, benefits and risks of therapy, and alternative management options. Only half were asked about preferences for information or decision-making involvement. Predictors of information detail given include patient sex, age, occupation, and education. Radiation and medical oncologists express prognosis and treatment benefit using similar phrases. When offered the chance to delay decision-making, most patients do so (P < .01). Final treatment decisions appear to be influenced by the presentation of choice in treatment options by the oncologist and whether the treatment decision was made during the initial consultation (P < .01). Information recall was not influenced by communication factors. Patients receiving less detailed information had slightly higher satisfaction with the consultation (P = .03). More anxious patients tended to be less satisfied (P = .07). Conclusion: The optimal way to discuss adjuvant therapy is undefined. More emphasis can be placed on soliciting patient preferences for information and decision-making involvement and tailoring both to the needs of the individual patient. Providing choice in treatment and delaying decision making may affect the patient's treatment decision. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1768 / 1778
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   INFORMATION AND DECISION-MAKING PREFERENCES OF HOSPITALIZED ADULT CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
BLANCHARD, CG ;
LABRECQUE, MS ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC ;
BLANCHARD, EB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1988, 27 (11) :1139-1145
[2]  
Bradley C, 1984, Diabet Med, V1, P213
[3]   PATIENT PERCEPTION OF INVOLVEMENT IN MEDICAL-CARE - RELATIONSHIP TO ILLNESS ATTITUDES AND OUTCOMES [J].
BRODY, DS ;
MILLER, SM ;
LERMAN, CE ;
SMITH, DG ;
CAPUTO, GC .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 4 (06) :506-511
[4]   COMPUTER-BASED INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF THE CANCER CONSULTATION [J].
BUTOW, PN ;
DUNN, SM ;
TATTERSALL, MHN ;
JONES, QJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 71 (05) :1115-1121
[5]  
Butow PN, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V77, P2630, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2630::AID-CNCR29>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-S
[7]   The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support [J].
Butow, PN ;
Maclean, M ;
Dunn, SM ;
Tattersall, MHN ;
Boyer, MJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (09) :857-863
[8]   INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) :832-836
[9]   Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer [J].
Degner, LF ;
Kristjanson, LJ ;
Bowman, D ;
Sloan, JA ;
Carriere, KC ;
ONeil, J ;
Bilodeau, B ;
Watson, P ;
Mueller, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (18) :1485-1492
[10]   DECISION-MAKING DURING SERIOUS ILLNESS - WHAT ROLE DO PATIENTS REALLY WANT TO PLAY [J].
DEGNER, LF ;
SLOAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (09) :941-950