Prediction of antagonistic muscle forces using inverse dynamic optimization during flexion extension of the knee

被引:58
作者
Li, G [1 ]
Kaufman, KR
Chao, EYS
Rubash, HE
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 1999年 / 121卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1115/1.2798327
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
This paper examined the feasibility of using different optimization criteria in inverse dynamic optimization to predict antagonistic muscle forces and joint reaction forces during isokinetic flexion/extension and isometric extension exercises of the knee. Both quadriceps and hamstrings muscle groups were included in this study. The knee joint motion included flexion/extension, varus/valgus, and internal/external rotations. Four linear, nonlinear, and physiological optimization criteria were utilized in the optimization procedure. All optimization criteria adopted in this paper were shown to be able to predict antagonistic muscle contraction during flexion and extension of the knee. The predicted muscle forces were compared in temporal patterns with EMG activities (averaged data measured from five subjects). Joint reaction forces were predicted to be similar using all optimization criteria. In comparison with previous studies, these results suggested that the kinematic information involved in the inverse dynamic optimization plays an important role in prediction of the recruitment of antagonistic muscles rather than the selection of a particular optimization criterion. Therefore, it might be concluded that a properly formulated inverse dynamic optimization procedure should describe the knee joint rotation in three orthogonal planes.
引用
收藏
页码:316 / 322
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
AN KN, 1984, J BIOMECH ENG-T ASME, V106, P364, DOI 10.1115/1.3138507
[2]  
ANDRIACCHI T P, 1984, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, V1, P266
[3]  
ARMS SW, 1984, AM J SPORT MED, V12, P8, DOI 10.1177/036354658401200102
[4]   MUSCULAR COACTIVATION - THE ROLE OF THE ANTAGONIST MUSCULATURE IN MAINTAINING KNEE STABILITY [J].
BARATTA, R ;
SOLOMONOW, M ;
ZHOU, BH ;
LETSON, D ;
CHUINARD, R ;
DAMBROSIA, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1988, 16 (02) :113-122
[5]   The effect of functional knee bracing on the anterior cruciate ligament in the weightbearing and nonweightbearing knee [J].
Beynnon, BD ;
Johnson, RJ ;
Fleming, BC ;
Peura, GD ;
Renstrom, PA ;
Nichols, CE ;
Pope, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (03) :353-359
[6]   A MODEL OF LOWER-EXTREMITY MUSCULAR ANATOMY [J].
BRAND, RA ;
CROWNINSHIELD, RD ;
WITTSTOCK, CE ;
PEDERSEN, DR ;
CLARK, CR ;
VANKRIEKEN, FM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1982, 104 (04) :304-310
[7]  
Challis J H, 1993, Proc Inst Mech Eng H, V207, P139, DOI 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_286_02
[8]   JUSTIFICATION OF TRIAXIAL GONIOMETER FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF JOINT ROTATION [J].
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1980, 13 (12) :989-+
[9]   ANTAGONISTIC-SYNERGISTIC MUSCLE ACTION AT THE KNEE DURING COMPETITIVE WEIGHTLIFTING [J].
COLLINS, JJ .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1994, 32 (02) :168-174
[10]   THE REDUNDANT NATURE OF LOCOMOTOR OPTIMIZATION LAWS [J].
COLLINS, JJ .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 28 (03) :251-267