Cervical collar or physiotherapy versus wait and see policy for recent onset cervical radiculopathy: randomised trial

被引:76
作者
Kuijper, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
Tans, Jos Th J. [2 ]
Beelen, Anita [3 ]
Nollet, Frans
de Visser, Marianne [4 ]
机构
[1] Maasstad Hosp, Dept Neurol, NL-3078 AC Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Dept Neurol, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil, Res Grp, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2009年 / 339卷
关键词
CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; ANALOG SCALE PAIN; RELIABILITY; SEVERITY; VALIDITY; DISCS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.b3883
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with collar or physiotherapy compared with a wait and see policy in recent onset cervical radiculopathy. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Neurology outpatient clinics in three Dutch hospitals. Participants 205 patients with symptoms and signs of cervical radiculopathy of less than one month's duration Interventions Treatment with a semi-hard collar and taking rest for three to six weeks; 12 twice weekly sessions of physiotherapy and home exercises for six weeks; or continuation of daily activities as much as possible without specific treatment (control group). Main outcome measures Time course of changes in pain scores for arm and neck pain on a 100 mm visual analogue scale and in the neck disability index during the first six weeks. Results In the wait and see group, arm pain diminished by 3 mm/week on the visual analogue scale (beta=-3.1 mm, 95% confidence interval -4.0 to -2.2 mm) and by 19 mm in total over six weeks. Patients who were treated with cervical collar or physiotherapy achieved additional pain reduction (collar: beta=-1.9 mm, -3.3 to -0.5 mm; physiotherapy: beta=-1.9, -3.3 to -0.8), resulting in an extra pain reduction compared with the control group of 12 mm after six weeks. In the wait and see group, neck pain did not decrease significantly in the first six weeks (beta= -0.9 mm, -2.0 to 0.3). Treatment with the collar resulted in a weekly reduction on the visual analogue scale of 2.8 mm (-4.2 to -1.3), amounting to 17 mm in six weeks, whereas physiotherapy gave a weekly reduction of 2.4 mm (-3.9 to -0.8) resulting in a decrease of 14 mm after six weeks. Compared with a wait and see policy, the neck disability index showed a significant change with the use of the collar and rest (beta=-0.9 mm, -1.6 to -0.1) and a non-significant effect with physiotherapy and home exercises. Conclusion A semi-hard cervical collar and rest for three to six weeks or physiotherapy accompanied by home exercises for six weeks reduced neck and arm pain substantially compared with a wait and see policy in the early phase of cervical radiculopathy.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Adams C, 1976, HDB CLIN NEUROLOGY 2, V26, P97
[2]
[Anonymous], BMJ
[3]
Cervical spondylosis and neck pain [J].
Binder, Allan I. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7592) :527-531
[4]
Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale [J].
Bird, SB ;
Dickson, EW .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (06) :639-643
[5]
The pathomorphologic changes that accompany the resolution of cervical radiculopathy - A prospective study with repeat magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Bush, K ;
Chaudhuri, R ;
Hillier, S ;
Penny, J .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (02) :183-186
[6]
CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY [J].
ELLENBERG, MR ;
HONET, JC ;
TREANOR, WJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (03) :342-352
[7]
Heckmann JG, 1999, J SPINAL DISORD, V12, P396
[8]
Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? [J].
Kelly, AM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (11) :1086-1090
[9]
The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain [J].
Kelly, AM .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (03) :205-207
[10]
Degenerative cervical radiculopathy: diagnosis and conservative treatment. A review [J].
Kuijper, B. ;
Tans, J. Th. J. ;
Schimsheimer, R. J. ;
van der Kallen, B. F. W. ;
Beelen, A. ;
Nollet, F. ;
de Visser, M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) :15-20