Can MDM2 and CDK4 make the diagnosis of well differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma? An immunohistochemical study on 129 soft tissue tumours

被引:87
作者
Aleixo, P. B. [1 ]
Hartmann, A. A.
Menezes, I. C.
Meurer, R. T.
Oliveira, A. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ciencias Saude Porto Alegre, Ctr Res & Postgrad Heitor Cirne Lima, BR-90050170 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Pathol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
DIFFERENTIATED LIPOSARCOMA; DEDIFFERENTIATED LIPOSARCOMA; GENE AMPLIFICATION; FOLLOW-UP; LIPOMA; RETROPERITONEUM; CANCER;
D O I
10.1136/jcp.2009.070201
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Background: Well differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) have been shown to have supernumerary chromosomes with amplified sequences of the MDM2 and CDK4 genes. MDM2 and CDK4 protein overexpression have also been identified in these tumours. Aim: To investigate whether immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MDM2 and CDK4 can be used to diagnose WDLPS and DDLPS. Methods: IHC for MDM2/CDK4 was carried out on a series of 129 paraffin-embedded lipomatous and non-lipomatous soft tissue tumours. The cases were divided into four groups: WDLPS (n=19), DDLPS (n=10), benign adipocytic tumours (BAT) (n=17), and other mesenquimal tumours (OMT) (n=83). IHC results were compared in each group and the diagnostic efficacy of the test in identifying WDLPS and DDLPS among the other soft tissue tumours was determined. A percentage of tumour cell positivity was evaluated to better characterise the pattern of tumour immunostaining. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of positive MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings to identify WDLPS among BAT was 100% and 58.8%, and 68.4% and 88.2%, respectively. When distinguishing DDLPS from OMT, sensitivity and specificity of MDM2 and CDK4 were 90% and 65%, and 70% and 96.3%, respectively. The highest specificity was achieved when a case was considered positive with strong and diffuse immunoreactivity in more than 30% of the neoplastic cells (94.1% and 100%, and 77.1% and 98.8%, respectively). Conclusion: Detection of MDM2/CDK4 protein overexpression by IHC can be used by pathologists to diagnose WDLPS and DDLPS. Considering a strong and diffuse immunostaining pattern in most of the neoplastic cells achieves the best results in identifying these tumours.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1135
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Gene amplification in cancer [J].
Albertson, Donna G. .
TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2006, 22 (08) :447-455
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, PATHOLOGY GENETICS T
[3]   MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes -: A comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data [J].
Binh, MBN ;
Sastre-Garau, X ;
Guillou, L ;
de Pinieux, G ;
Terrier, P ;
Lagacé, R ;
Aurias, A ;
Hostein, I ;
Coindre, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (10) :1340-1347
[4]   Distinction between lipoma and liposarcoma by MDM2 alterations:: A case report of simultaneously occurring tumors and review of the literature [J].
Boltze, C ;
Schneider-Stock, R ;
Jäger, V ;
Roessner, A .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2001, 197 (08) :563-568
[5]   Most malignant fibrous histiocytomas developed in the retroperitoneum are dedifferentiated liposarcomas: A review of 25 cases initially diagnosed as malignant fibrous histiocytoma [J].
Coindre, JM ;
Mariani, O ;
Chibon, F ;
Mairal, A ;
Somerhausen, ND ;
Favre-Guillevin, E ;
Bui, NB ;
Stoeckle, E ;
Hostein, I ;
Aurias, A .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (03) :256-262
[6]  
Dei Tos A P, 2000, Ann Diagn Pathol, V4, P252, DOI 10.1053/adpa.2000.8133
[7]  
EIGAR F, 1997, MODERN PATHOL, V10, P113
[8]   Atypical lipomatous tumor, its variants, and its combined forms - A study of 61 cases, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years [J].
Evans, Harry L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 31 (01) :1-14
[9]  
Evans HL, 1988, SURG PATHOL, V1, P41
[10]  
Fletcher CDM, 2007, DIAGNOSTIC HISTOPATH, P1528