Minnesota's Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payment Program: An Innovative Model for Promoting Care Quality

被引:21
作者
Cooke, Valerie [1 ]
Arling, Greg [2 ]
Lewis, Teresa [1 ]
Abrahamson, Kathleen A. [3 ]
Mueller, Christine [4 ]
Edstrom, Lisa [5 ]
机构
[1] Dept Human Serv, Nursing Facil Rates & Policy Div, St Paul, MN 55164 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Aging Res, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Western Kentucky Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Bowling Green, KY USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sch Nursing, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Ctr Aging, Minnesota Area Geriatr Educ Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Medicaid; Reimbursement; Evaluation; Value; PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1093/geront/gnp140
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Purpose: Minnesota's Nursing Facility Performance-Based Incentive Payment Program (PIPP) supports provider-initiated projects aimed at improving care quality and efficiency. PIPP moves beyond conventional pay for performance. It seeks to promote implementation of evidence-based practices, encourage innovation and risk taking, foster collaboration and shared learning, and establish a solid case for investing in better quality from the perspective of the state, providers, and consumers. We explain PIPP rationale and design, describe projects and participating facilities, and present findings from interviews with project leaders. Design and Methods: Provider-initiated projects lasting from 1 to 3 years are selected through a competitive process and are funded for up to 5% of the daily operating per diem rate. Providers are at risk of losing up to 20% of their project funding if they fail to achieve targets on state nursing facility performance measures. Results: Minnesota has made a major investment in the PIPP by supporting 45 individual or collaborative projects, representing approximately 160 facilities and annual funding of approximately $18 million. Projects involve a wide range of interventions, such as fall reduction, wound prevention, exercise, improved continence, pain management, resident-centered care and culture change, and transitions to the community. Implications: The PIPP can serve as a model for other states seeking to promote nursing facility quality either in combination or in place of conventional pay-for-performance efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 563
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PAYING QUALITY UNDER
[2]   Medicaid Nursing Home Pay for Performance: Where Do We Stand? [J].
Arling, Greg ;
Job, Carol ;
Cooke, Valerie .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 49 (05) :587-595
[3]  
Briesacher BA, 2009, HEALTH CARE FINANC R, V30, P1
[4]  
Dudley RA., 2004, Strategies To Support Quality-based Purchasing: A Review of the Evidence. Strategies To Support Quality-based Purchasing: A Review of the Evidence
[5]   A quality-based payment strategy for nursing home care in Minnesota [J].
Kane, Robert L. ;
Arling, Greg ;
Mueller, Christine ;
Held, Robert ;
Cooke, Valerie .
GERONTOLOGIST, 2007, 47 (01) :108-115
[6]   The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality [J].
Kilpatrick, KE ;
Lohr, KN ;
Leatherman, S ;
Pink, G ;
Buckel, JM ;
Legarde, C ;
Whitener, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 17 (04) :347-355
[7]   The business case for quality: Case studies and an analysis [J].
Leatherman, S ;
Berwick, D ;
Iles, D ;
Lewin, LS ;
Davidoff, F ;
Nolan, T ;
Bisognano, M .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2003, 22 (02) :17-30
[8]   Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? [J].
Petersen, Laura A. ;
Woodard, LeChauncy D. ;
Urech, Tracy ;
Daw, Christina ;
Sookanan, Supicha .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 145 (04) :265-272
[9]   How to develop a business case for quality [J].
Reiter, Kristin L. ;
Kilpatrick, Kerry E. ;
Greene, Sandra B. ;
Lohr, Kathleen N. ;
Leatherman, Sheila .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 19 (01) :50-55
[10]   What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? [J].
Rosenthal, MB ;
Frank, RG .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2006, 63 (02) :135-157