Detection of colorectal lesions: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonograph compared with conventional colonoscopy

被引:92
作者
Iannaccone, R
Laghi, A
Catalano, C
Brink, JA
Mangiapane, F
Trenna, S
Piacentini, F
Passariello, R
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Radiol Sci, Policlin Umberto I, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
cancer screening; colon; CT; colon neoplasms; computed tomography (CT); multi-detector row;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2293021399
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of lower-close multi-detector row helical computed tomographic (CT) colonography with that of conventional colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight patients underwent multi-detector row helical CT colonography (beam collimation, 4 x 2.5 mm; table feed, 17.5 mm/sec; voltage, 140 kV; and effective dose, 10 mAs) followed by conventional colonoscopy. Conventional colonoscopy served as the reference standard. Two radiologists interpreted CT colonographic images to assess the presence of polyps or carcinomas. Sensitivity was calculated on both a per-polyp and a per-patient basis. In the latter, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Weighted CT dose index was calculated on the basis of measurements obtained in a standard body phantom. Effective dose was estimated by using commercially available software. RESULTS: CT colonography correctly depicted all 22 carcinomas (sensitivity, 100%) and 52 of 74 polyps (sensitivity, 70.3%). Sensitivity for detection was 100% in all 13 polyps 10 mm or larger in diameter, 83.3% in 20 of 24 polyps 6-9 mm, and 51.3% in 19 of 37 lesions 5 mm or smaller. With regard to the per-patient analysis, CT colonography had a sensitivity of 96.0%, a specificity of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 94.1%, and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The total weighted CT dose index for combined prone and supine acquisitions was 2.74 mGy. The simulated effective doses for complete CT colonography were 1.8 mSv in men and 2.4 mSv in women. CONCLUSION: Lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography ensures substantial dose reduction while maintaining excellent sensitivity for detection of colorectal carcinomas and polyps larger than 6 mm in diameter. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 781
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] *41 WORLD MED ASS, 1990, B PAN AM HLTH ORG, V24, P606
  • [2] Virtual colonoscopy - Promising, but not ready for widespread use
    Bond, JH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) : 1540 - 1542
  • [3] CT colonography: Value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions
    Chen, SC
    Lu, DSK
    Hecht, JR
    Kadell, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (03) : 595 - 599
  • [4] CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps
    Dachman, AH
    Kuniyoshi, JK
    Boyle, CM
    Samara, Y
    Hoffmann, KR
    Rubin, DT
    Hanan, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) : 989 - 995
  • [5] Edwards JT, 2001, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V96, P3009
  • [6] Virtual colonoscopy: What will the issues be?
    Fenlon, HM
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (02) : 453 - 458
  • [7] Occlusive colon carcinoma: Virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon
    Fenlon, HM
    McAneny, DB
    Nunes, DP
    Clarke, PD
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 210 (02) : 423 - 428
  • [8] A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps
    Fenlon, HM
    Nunes, DP
    Schroy, PC
    Barish, MA
    Clarke, PD
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) : 1496 - 1503
  • [9] Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: Promise, polyps, politics
    Ferrucci, JT
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (05) : 975 - 988
  • [10] Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients
    Fletcher, JG
    Johnson, CD
    Welch, TJ
    MacCarty, RL
    Ahlquist, DA
    Reed, JE
    Harmsen, WS
    Wilson, LA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) : 704 - 711