Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:38
作者
Campbell, Robert Brick [2 ]
Jordan, Susan S. [1 ]
Sekiya, Jon K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Ctr Sports Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15203 USA
[2] Virginia Inst Sports Med, Virginia Beach, VA USA
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament; reconstruction; tibial inlay; allograft; arthroscopic;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.020
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries remains controversial. There is no consensus on the ideal technique for reconstruction or the optimal graft design. Specifically, there is intense debate about which technique is superior: the open tibial inlay technique or the transtibial arthroscopic technique. We present a novel all-arthroscopic tibial inlay technique using a bifid bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft. This technique offers the advantages of the open tibial inlay technique, including avoidance of the killer turn and restoration of biomechanical stability. Furthermore, this technique is completely arthroscopic and therefore avoids the morbidity of the open tibial inlay technique from the posterior incision and capsulotomy. Our technique also avoids the need for repositioning of the patient intraoperatively. Our technique recreates the double-bundle anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and provides bony fixation on both tibial and femoral sides. Our cadaveric studies have shown that our technique restores stability as effectively as the traditional open tibial inlay technique. Early results in our first 11 cases are promising.
引用
收藏
页码:1356.e1 / 1356.e4
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of posterior Cruciate ligament fibers - Clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up [J].
Ahn, JH ;
Yang, HS ;
Jeong, TK ;
Koh, KH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (02) :194-204
[2]
A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques [J].
Bergfeld, JA ;
McAllister, DR ;
Parker, RD ;
Valdevit, ADC ;
Kambic, HE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (02) :129-136
[3]
CAMPBELL RB, 2007, IN PRESS AM J SPORTS
[4]
The graft/tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel placement [J].
Handy, MH ;
Blessey, PB ;
Kline, AJ ;
Miller, MD .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (06) :711-714
[5]
Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces [J].
Margheritini, F ;
Mauro, CS ;
Rihn, JA ;
Stabile, KJ ;
Woo, SLY ;
Harner, CD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) :587-593
[6]
Full arthroscopic inlay reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament [J].
Mariani, Pier Paolo ;
Margheritini, Fabrizio .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2006, 14 (11) :1038-1044
[7]
Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods [J].
Markolf, KL ;
Zemanovic, JR ;
McAllister, DR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (04) :518-524
[8]
A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques - Graft pretension and knee laxity [J].
McAllister, DR ;
Markolf, KL ;
Oakes, DA ;
Young, CR ;
McWilliams, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (03) :312-317
[9]
Miller CH, 2002, AM J DENT, V15, P137
[10]
Clinical outcomes after isolated arthroscopic single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Sekiya, JK ;
West, RV ;
Ong, BC ;
Irrgang, JJ ;
Fu, FH ;
Harner, CD .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (09) :1042-1050