The Impact of Prostate Volume, Number of Biopsy Cores and American Urological Association Symptom Score on the Sensitivity of Cancer Detection Using the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator

被引:37
作者
Ankerst, Donna P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Till, Cathee [4 ]
Boeck, Andreas [2 ]
Goodman, Phyllis [4 ]
Tangen, Catherine M. [4 ]
Feng, Ziding [5 ]
Partin, Alan W. [6 ,7 ]
Chan, Daniel W. [6 ,7 ]
Sokoll, Lori [6 ,7 ]
Kagan, Jacob [8 ]
Wei, John T. [9 ]
Thompson, Ian M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Math, Garching, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Life Sci, Garching, Germany
[4] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, SW Oncol Grp, Ctr Stat, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Program Biostat & Biomath, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[8] NCI, Canc Biomarkers Res Grp, Canc Prevent Div, Rockville, MD USA
[9] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; risk; algorithms; early detection of cancer; DETECTION RESEARCH NETWORK; COLLABORATIVE GROUP; VALIDATION; ANTIGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.108
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed the independent predictive value of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores and AUASS (American Urological Association symptom score) compared to risk factors included in the PCPTRC (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator for prostate cancer) and PCPTHG (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator for high grade cancer [Gleason grade 7 or greater]). Materials and Methods: Of 5,519 PCPT (Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial) participants used to construct the PCPTRC 4,958 with AUASS and prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less were included on logistic regression analysis. Risk algorithms were evaluated in 571 EDRN (Early Detection Research Network) participants using the ROC AUC. Results: A total of 1,094 participants (22.1%) had prostate cancer, of whom 232 (21.2%) had high grade disease. For prostate cancer prediction higher prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, family history of prostate cancer and number of cores were associated with increased risk, while volume was associated with decreased risk. Excluding prostate volume and number of cores, a history of negative biopsy and increased AUASS were also associated with lower risk. For high grade cancer higher prostate specific antigen, abnormal digital rectal examination, black race and number of cores were associated with increased risk and volume, while AUASS was associated with decreased risk. The AUC of the PCPTRC adjusted for volume and number of cores was 72.7% (using EDRN data), 68.2% when adjusted for AUASS alone and 67.6% PCPTRC. For high grade disease the AUCs were 74.8%, 74.0% and 73.5% (PCPTHG), respectively. Conclusions: Adjusted PCPT risk calculators for volume, number of cores and AUASS improve cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 76
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Evaluating the PCPT risk calculator in ten international biopsy cohorts: results from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Boeck, Andreas
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Hamdy, Freddie
    Neal, David
    Donovan, Jenny
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Klocker, Helmut
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Benchikh, Amine
    Salama, Gilles
    Villers, Arnauld
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Lilja, Hans
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 181 - 187
  • [2] Ankerst DP, WORLD J UROL
  • [3] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [4] Validation in a Multiple Urology Practice Cohort of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Calculator for Predicting Prostate Cancer Detection
    Eyre, Stephen J.
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Wei, John T.
    Nair, Prakash V.
    Regan, Meredith M.
    Bueti, Gerrardina
    Tang, Jeffrey
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Kearney, Michael
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2653 - 2658
  • [5] Evidence for a biopsy derived grade artifact among larger prostate glands
    Kulkarni, GS
    Al-Azab, R
    Lockwood, G
    Toi, A
    Evans, A
    Trachtenberg, J
    Jewett, MAS
    Finelli, A
    Fleshner, NE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (02) : 505 - 509
  • [6] External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator in a screened population
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Ankerst, Donna Pauler
    Higgins, Betsy A.
    Hernandez, Javier
    Canby-Hagino, Edith.
    Brand, Timothy
    Troyer, Dean A.
    Leach, Robin J.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (06) : 1152 - 1155
  • [7] A Prospective, Multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network Study of [-2]proPSA: Improving Prostate Cancer Detection and Correlating with Cancer Aggressiveness
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Feng, Ziding
    Kagan, Jacob
    Mizrahi, Isaac A.
    Broyles, Dennis L.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Srivastava, Sudhir
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Wei, John T.
    Zhang, Zhen
    Chan, Daniel W.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (05) : 1193 - 1200
  • [8] Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level ≤4.0 ng per milliliter
    Thompson, IM
    Pauler, DK
    Goodman, PJ
    Tangen, CM
    Lucia, MS
    Parnes, HL
    Minasian, LM
    Ford, LG
    Lippman, SM
    Crawford, ED
    Crowley, JJ
    Coltman, CA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (22) : 2239 - 2246
  • [9] Assessing prostate cancer risk: Results from the prostate cancer prevention trial
    Thompson, IM
    Ankerst, DP
    Chi, C
    Goodman, PJ
    Tangen, CM
    Lucia, MS
    Feng, ZD
    Parnes, HL
    Coltman, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (08) : 529 - 534
  • [10] Prediction Models: Revolutionary in Principle, But Do They Do More Good Than Harm?
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (22) : 2951 - 2952