Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis

被引:47
作者
Schöbel, WA
Voelker, W
Haase, KK
Karsch, KR
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Cardiol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Klinikum Mannheim, Dept Cardiol, Mannheim, Germany
[3] Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Dept Cardiol, D-6700 Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; multi-tip micromanometer catheter; pressure recovery;
D O I
10.1053/euhj.1998.1479
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims In experimental studies the recovery of pressure distal to stenotic valve orifices has been well described. We evaluated the extent, determinants, and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Methods and Results The study was performed in 37 patients with aortic valve stenosis, in whom cardiac catheterization was performed and left ventricular and aortic pressures were determined using a high-fidelity multi-tip micromanometer catheter. To register the pressure waveforms accurately the catheter was positioned so that the proximal micromanometer was in the left ventricle, the second at the site of minimal pressure in the vena contracta, and the third (the most distal) in the ascending aorta 16 cm further downstream. The amount of pressure recovery within the ascending aorta was up to 44% of the maximal pressure drop. The index pressure recovery was directly correlated to the Gorlin-derived aortic valve area (r=0.80) and indirectly correlated to the ratio of aortic valve area and the cross-sectional area of the ascending aorta. Conclusions This clinical study confirmed experimental data, that index pressure recovery is dependent on the ratio of the effective valve area and the cross-sectional area of the ascending aorta. Pressure recovery may need to be considered in patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis and with a small cross-sectional area of the ascending aorta.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1363
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Evaluation of the significance of a transvalvular catheter aortic valve gradient in aortic stenosis: A direct hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study [J].
Adele, C ;
Vaitkus, PT ;
Tischler, MD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 79 (04) :513-&
[2]   EFFECT OF STENOSIS GEOMETRY ON THE DOPPLER-CATHETER GRADIENT RELATION INVITRO - A MANIFESTATION OF PRESSURE RECOVERY [J].
BAUMGARTNER, H ;
SCHIMA, H ;
TULZER, G ;
KUHN, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 21 (04) :1018-1025
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis [J].
Blitz, LR ;
Herrmann, HC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (06) :657-661
[5]   DEPENDENCE OF GORLIN FORMULA AND CONTINUITY EQUATION VALVE AREAS ON TRANSVALVULAR VOLUME FLOW-RATE IN VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
BURWASH, IG ;
THOMAS, DD ;
SADAHIRO, M ;
PEARLMAN, AS ;
VERRIER, ED ;
THOMAS, R ;
KRAFT, CD ;
OTTO, CM .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 89 (02) :827-835
[6]   Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis - The role of the Reynolds number [J].
Cape, EG ;
Jones, M ;
Yamada, I ;
VanAuker, MD ;
ValdesCruz, LM .
CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (11) :2975-2981
[7]   CHANGES IN ARTERIAL-PRESSURE DURING LEFT HEART PULLBACK IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC-STENOSIS - SIGN OF SEVERE AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
CARABELLO, BA ;
BARRY, WH ;
GROSSMAN, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1979, 44 (03) :424-427
[8]   EFFECTS OF DOBUTAMINE ON GORLIN AND CONTINUITY EQUATION VALVE AREAS AND VALVE RESISTANCE IN VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS [J].
CASALE, PN ;
PALACIOS, IF ;
ABASCAL, VM ;
HARRELL, L ;
DAVIDOFF, R ;
WEYMAN, AE ;
FIFER, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 70 (13) :1175-1179
[10]   FLUID-MECHANICS OF AORTIC-STENOSIS .2. UNSTEADY-FLOW EXPERIMENTS [J].
CLARK, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1976, 9 (09) :567-&