Preemptive R&D, rent dissipation, and the ''leverage theory''

被引:24
作者
Choi, JP
机构
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2946711
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper provides a new perspective on the validity of the so-called ''leverage theory.'' In a model of preemptive innovation in ''systems'' markets, I examine the effect of bundling on R&D incentives. I find that bundling provides a channel through which monopoly ''slack'' in one component market can be shifted to another, with the effect of mitigating rent dissipation in the systems market. Bundling can be profitable if this beneficial effect of reduced rent dissipation outweighs the negative effect of intensified price competition. After demonstrating the private optimality of bundling, its welfare implications are considered. Finally, the results can be reinterpreted to analyze the relationship between compatibility decisions and R&D incentives in mix-and-match models.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1181
页数:29
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ADAMS W, 1982, Q REV ECON BUS, V22, P29
[2]   COMMODITY BUNDLING AND BURDEN OF MONOPOLY [J].
ADAMS, WJ ;
YELLEN, JL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 90 (03) :475-498
[3]  
AMRAM Y, 1995, INFORMATIONWEEK, P96
[4]   MULTIMARKET CONTACT AND COLLUSIVE BEHAVIOR [J].
BERNHEIM, BD ;
WHINSTON, MD .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1990, 21 (01) :1-26
[5]  
Bork Robert., 1978, ANTITRUST PARADOX
[6]   TYING ARRANGEMENTS AND THE LEVERAGE PROBLEM [J].
BOWMAN, WS .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1957, 67 (01) :19-36
[7]   A STRATEGIC MOTIVATION FOR COMMODITY BUNDLING [J].
CARBAJO, J ;
DEMEZA, D ;
SEIDMANN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 38 (03) :283-298
[8]  
CHOI JP, 1995, 84 CTR EC STUD
[9]  
CHOI JP, 1993, UNPUB STRATEGIC BUND
[10]  
David P.A., 1990, EC INNOVATION NEW TE, V1, P3, DOI DOI 10.1080/10438599000000002