Calibrate without Calibrating: An Iterative Approach in Participatory Sensing Network

被引:26
作者
Xiang, Chaocan [1 ]
Yang, Panlong [1 ]
Tian, Chang [1 ]
Cai, Haibin [2 ]
Liu, Yunhao [3 ]
机构
[1] PLA Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Commun Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] E China Normal Univ, Software Engn Inst, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Software, MOE Key Lab Informat Syst Secur, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Participatory sensing; sensor calibration; expectation maximization (EM) method; MOBILE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/TPDS.2014.2308205
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
With widespread usages of smart phones, participatory sensing becomes mainstream, especially for applications requiring pervasive deployments with massive sensors. However, the sensors on smart phones are prone to the unknown measurement errors, requiring automatic calibration among uncooperative participants. Current methods need either collaboration or explicit calibration process. However, due to the uncooperative and uncontrollable nature of the participants, these methods fail to calibrate sensor nodes effectively. We investigate sensor calibration in monitoring pollution sources, without explicit calibration process in uncooperative environment. We leverage the opportunity in sensing diversity, where a participant will sense multiple pollution sources when roaming in the area. Further, inspired by expectation maximization (EM) method, we propose a two-level iterative algorithm to estimate the source presences, source parameters and sensor noise iteratively. The key insight is that, only based on the participatory observations, we can "calibrate sensors without explicit or cooperative calibrating process". Theoretical analysis proves that, our method can converge to the optimal estimation of sensor noise, where the likelihood of observations is maximized. Also, extensive simulations show that, ours improves the estimation accuracy of sensor bias up to 20 percent and that of sensor noise deviation up to 30 percent, compared with three baseline methods.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 361
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P ACM SENS WORKSH WO
[2]  
Bai F., 2003, Ad Hoc Networks, V1, P383, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1570-8705(03)00040-4
[3]  
Balzano L, 2007, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS, P79, DOI 10.1109/IPSN.2007.4379667
[4]  
Bychkovskiy V., 2003, LNCS, P556
[5]  
Carlin B.P., 1997, Stat. Comput., DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1018577817064, 10.1023/A:1018577817064]
[6]  
Chin J.-C., 2008, P ACM 6 C EMB NETW S
[7]   Identification of Low-Level Point Radioactive Sources Using a Sensor Network [J].
Chin, Jren-Chit ;
Rao, Nageswara S. V. ;
Yau, David K. Y. ;
Shankar, Mallikarjun ;
Yang, Yong ;
Hou, Jennifer C. ;
Srivathsan, Srinivasagopalan ;
Iyengar, Sitharama .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON SENSOR NETWORKS, 2010, 7 (03)
[8]  
Cover T. M., 2006, Elements of information theory, Vsecond, DOI [DOI 10.1002/047174882X, 10.1002/0471200611]
[9]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
LAIRD, NM ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01) :1-38
[10]  
Faulkner M., 2011, Proceedings 2011 10th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN 2010), P13