Demands on response inhibition processes determine modulations of theta band activity in superior frontal areas and correlations with pupillometry - Implications for the norepinephrine system during inhibitory control

被引:82
作者
Dippel, Gabriel [1 ]
Mueckschel, Moritz [1 ,2 ]
Ziemssen, Tjalf [2 ]
Beste, Christian [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med, Dept Child & Adolescent Psychiat, Cognit Neurophysiol, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, MS Ctr Dresden,Ctr Clin Neurosci, Dresden, Germany
[3] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Expt Neurobiol, Klecany, Czech Republic
关键词
Response inhibition; Pupil diameter; Norepinephrine; EEG; Theta; Superior frontal cortex; LOCUS-COERULEUS; PUPIL DIAMETER; NEURAL OSCILLATIONS; SUSTAINED ATTENTION; ADAPTIVE GAIN; CONFLICT; EEG; ERP; SELECTION; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.037
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Response inhibition processes are important for goal-directed behavior and particularly demanded when it is unlikely to inhibit automatically executed responses. It has been suggested that the norepinephrine (NE) system is important to consider for such likelihood effects. As an indirect measure of the NE system activity we used the pupil diameter and integrated this data with neurophysiological (EEG) data and beamforming analyses. The study shows that inhibitory control processes reflected by theta oscillations are strongly modulated by the likelihood to employ these processes and that these mechanisms were related to neural processes in the SMA and SFG. Probably, the modulations observed for theta band activity may reflect modulations in the encoding of a surprise, or conflict signal. Interestingly, correlation analyses of neuronal activity at the sensor and the source level with pupil diameter data revealed strong correlations that were only seen in the condition where inhibitory control processes were rarely demanded. On the basis of findings and theoretical models suggesting that the pupil diameter can be interpreted as a proximate of NE system activity the results may be interpreted that the NE system modulates inhibitory control processes via theta band activity in the SFB when the likelihood to inhibit a prepotent response tendency is low. From this it may be speculated that the NE system dynamically gains and loses relevance to modulate inhibitory control depending on boundary conditions that determine the mode of responding.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 585
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR NEUROPSYCHOPHARM
[2]   inhibitrion and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on [J].
Aron, Adam R. ;
Robbins, Trevor W. ;
Poldrack, Russell A. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (04) :177-185
[3]   An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance [J].
Aston-Jones, G ;
Cohen, JD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 28 :403-450
[4]  
ASTONJONES G, 1994, J NEUROSCI, V14, P4467
[5]   Inhibition and impulsivity: Behavioral and neural basis of response control [J].
Bari, Andrea ;
Robbins, Trevor W. .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2013, 108 :44-79
[6]  
Beste C, 2017, MOV DISORD OFF J MOV
[7]   On the role of fronto-striatal neural synchronization processes for response inhibition-Evidence from ERP phase-synchronization analyses in pre-manifest Huntington's disease gene mutation carriers [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Ness, Vanessa ;
Falkenstein, Michael ;
Saft, Carsten .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2011, 49 (12) :3484-3493
[8]   Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: Basal ganglia disease effects [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Willemssen, Rita ;
Saft, Carsten ;
Falkenstein, Michael .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2010, 48 (02) :366-373
[9]   Effects of stimulus-response compatibility on inhibitory processes in Parkinson's disease [J].
Beste, Christian ;
Dziobek, Isabel ;
Hielscher, Horst ;
Willemssen, Rita ;
Falkenstein, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 29 (04) :855-860
[10]   Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control [J].
Cavanagh, James F. ;
Frank, Michael J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (08) :414-421