Efficient vehicles versus efficient transportation. Comparing transportation energy conservation strategies

被引:54
作者
Litman, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Transport Policy Inst, Victoria, BC V8V 3R7, Canada
关键词
fuel efficiency; energy conservation; rebound; evaluation; cost analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article compares four potential transportation energy conservation strategies using a comprehensive evaluation framework that takes into account how each strategy affects annual vehicle travel, and therefore, mileage-related impacts such as traffic congestion, road and parking facility costs and crash risk. Mileage-related impacts tend to be large in magnitude compared with energy conservation benefits, so even small changes in total vehicle travel can have a large impact on net benefits. Fuel efficiency standards and some alternative fuels cause vehicle travel to increase. Higher fuel taxes cause a combination of increased vehicle fuel economy and reduced mileage. Mobility management strategies cause relatively large mileage reductions and so provide the greatest mileage-related benefits. Conventional evaluation practices often overlook mileage-related impacts and so tend to overvalue strategies that increase vehicle fuel efficiency and undervalue mobility management strategies. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 129
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
AGRAS J, 1999, CONT EC POLICY, V17
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]  
BRICKER A, 1997, ENV IMPACTS SAFETY E
[4]  
Campbell C.J., 1998, Scientific American, P78
[5]  
*CBO, 2003, FUL EC STAND VERS GA
[6]  
DINGS JMW, 2003, EXTERNAL INFRASTRUCT
[7]  
GLAISTER S, 2000, EFFECT FUEL PRICES M
[8]   Why CAFE worked [J].
Greene, DL .
ENERGY POLICY, 1998, 26 (08) :595-613
[9]  
*KONS, 2004, KNOWL SUST URB LAND
[10]  
KREITH F, 1995, TRANSPORT Q, V49, P5