Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation

被引:294
作者
McDaniels, Timothy [1 ]
Chang, Stephanie [1 ,2 ]
Cole, Darren
Mikawoz, Joseph
Longstaff, Holly [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, IRES, Ctr Human Settlements, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, SCARP, Ctr Human Settlements, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, W Maurice Young Ctr Appl Eth, Vancouver, BC, Canada
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2008年 / 18卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
resilience; infrastructure systems; extreme events; robustness and rapidity; hospitals;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.03.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Resilience of complex systems has emerged as a fundamental concern for system managers, users, and researchers. This paper addresses resilience within infrastructure systems, after an extreme event such as an earthquake. it develops a conceptual framework for understanding the factors that influence the resilience of infrastructure systems in terms of two dimensions: robustness (the extent of system function that is maintained) and rapidity (the time required to return to full system operations and productivity). The paper also characterizes a framework through the use of flow diagrams for understanding kinds of decisions that can be pursued within infrastructure systems to foster these two dimensions of system resilience. It uses the results of several data-gathering efforts, including preparation of a database on infrastructure interactions, interviews with hospital emergency managers, and interviews with other kinds of infrastructure system operators. The paper then applies this framework to the example of planning for system resilience within individual hospitals in the context of earthquake mitigation efforts. The results indicate that common decision contexts (both ex-ante and ex-post) arise across many different infrastructure contexts when considering ways to make infrastructure systems more resilient. The detailed discussion of hospitals points to the importance of learning from experience in previous disasters, of managing the availability of the facility's staff in a disaster, of daily communication among the staff to ensure high utilization of the available hospital capacity, and of flexibility in ways of addressing specific system failures such as water. The results also point to several ways in which the flow diagrams can be used for ongoing planning and implementation to enhance infrastructure system resilience. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 318
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, RISK COMMUNICATION M
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, NAVIGATING NATURES D
  • [3] Berkes F, 1998, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511541957, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957]
  • [4] A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities
    Bruneau, M
    Chang, SE
    Eguchi, RT
    Lee, GC
    O'Rourke, TD
    Reinhorn, AM
    Shinozuka, M
    Tierney, K
    Wallace, WA
    von Winterfeldt, D
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) : 733 - 752
  • [5] From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what?
    Carpenter, S
    Walker, B
    Anderies, JM
    Abel, N
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 4 (08) : 765 - 781
  • [6] Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities
    Chang, SE
    Shinozuka, M
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2004, 20 (03) : 739 - 755
  • [7] Infrastructure failure interdependencies in extreme events: power outage consequences in the 1998 Ice Storm
    Chang, Stephanie E.
    McDaniels, Timothy L.
    Mikawoz, Joey
    Peterson, Krista
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2007, 41 (02) : 337 - 358
  • [8] Clemen R. T, 2004, Making Hard Decisions
  • [9] COLE D, 2006, THESIS PLANNING U BR
  • [10] Gunderson L.H., 1995, Barriers and bridges to renewal of ecosystems and institutions