Varying rates of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea at prevention epicenter hospitals

被引:37
作者
Sohn, S
Climo, M
Diekema, D
Fraser, V
Herwaldt, L
Marino, S
Noskin, G
Perl, T
Song, XY
Tokars, J
Warren, D
Wong, E
Yokoe, DS
Zembower, T
Sepkowitz, KA
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Holmes McGuire Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Richmond, VA USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Healthcare Qual Promot, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/502601
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) causes substantial healthcare-associated morbidity. Unlike other common healthcare-associated pathogens, little comparative information is available about CDAD rates in hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine CDAD rates per 10,000 patient-days and per 1,000 hospital admissions at 7 geographically diverse tertiary-care centers from 2000 to 2003, and to survey participating centers on methods of CDAD surveillance and case definition. METHODS: Each center provided specific information for the study period, including case numbers, patient-days, and hospital characteristics. Case definitions and laboratory diagnoses of healthcare-associated CDAD were determined by each institution. Within institutions, case definitions remained consistent during the study period. RESULTS: Overall, mean annual case rates of CDAD were 12.1 per 10,000 patient-days (range, 3.1 to 25.1) and 7.4 per 1,000 hospital admissions (range, 3.1 to 13.1). No significant increases were observed in CDAD case rates during the 4-year interval, either at individual centers or in the Prevention Epicenter hospitals as a whole. Prevention Epicenter hospitals differed in their CDAD case definitions. Different case definitions used by the hospitals applied to a fixed data set resulted in a 30% difference in rates. No associations were identified between diagnostic test or case definition used and the relative rate of CDAD at a specific medical center. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of CDAD vary widely at tertiary-care centers across the United States. No significant increases in case rates were identified. The varying clinical and laboratory approaches to diagnosis complicated comparisons between hospitals. To facilitate benchmarking and comparisons between institutions, we recommend development of a more standardized case definition.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 679
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Secular trends in hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile disease in the United States, 1987-2001 [J].
Archibald, LK ;
Banerjee, SN ;
Jarvis, WR .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 189 (09) :1585-1589
[2]  
Fekety R, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P739
[3]   Recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhea: Characteristics of and risk factors for patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial [J].
Fekety, R ;
McFarland, LV ;
Surawicz, CM ;
Greenberg, RN ;
Elmer, GW ;
Mulligan, ME .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 24 (03) :324-333
[4]  
GERDING DN, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P459
[5]  
KAPLAN JE, 2004, 14 ANN M SOC HEALTHC
[6]  
Kleinbaum DG., 1988, STUDENTS PARTIAL SOL, Vvol 601
[7]   Health care costs and mortality associated with nosocomial diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile [J].
Kyne, L ;
Hamel, MB ;
Polavaram, R ;
Kelly, CNP .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (03) :346-353
[8]  
McDonald LC, 2004, 14 ANN M SOC HEALTHC
[9]   Breaking the cycle:: Treatment strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease [J].
McFarland, LV ;
Elmer, GW ;
Surawicz, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (07) :1769-1775
[10]   Clostridium difficile in long-term-care facilities for the elderly [J].
Simor, AE ;
Bradley, SF ;
Strausbaugh, LJ ;
Crossley, K ;
Nicolle, LE .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (11) :696-703