Gastric acid control with esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole: A five-way crossover study

被引:347
作者
Miner, P
Katz, PO
Chen, YS
Sostek, M
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma Fdn Digest Res, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] Grad Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19146 USA
[3] AstraZeneca LP, Div Biostat, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] AstraZeneca LP, Div Clin Res, Wilmington, DE USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amjgastroenterol.2003.09.053
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Proton pump inhibitors owe their clinical efficacy to their ability to suppress gastric acid production. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare intragastric pH following standard doses of esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole. Methods: This randomized, open-label, comparative five-way crossover study evaluated the 24-h intragastric pH profile of oral esomeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, pantoprazole 40 mg, and rabeprazole 20 mg once daily in 34 Helicobacter pylori-negative patients aged 18-60 yr with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients were randomly assigned to one of five treatment sequences and study drug was taken on 5 consecutive mornings 30 minutes prior to a standardized breakfast. A washout period of at least 10 days separated each treatment phase. Results: Thirty-four patients provided evaluable data for all five comparators. The mean number of hours of evaluable pH data was greater than or equal to23.75 hours. On day 5, intragastric pH was maintained above 4.0 for a mean of 14.0 h with esomeprazole, 12.1 h with rabeprazole, 11.8 h with omeprazole, 11.5 h with lansoprazole, and 10.1 h with pantoprazole (pless than or equal to0.001 for differences between esomeprazole and all other comparators). Esomeprazole also provided a significantly higher percentage of patients with an intragastric pH greater than 4.0 for more than 12 h relative to the other proton pump inhibitors (p<0.05). The frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. Conclusions: Esomeprazole at the standard dose of 40 mg once daily provided more effective control of gastric acid at steady state than standard doses of lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
引用
收藏
页码:2616 / 2620
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   APPROPRIATE ACID SUPPRESSION FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE [J].
BELL, NJV ;
BURGET, D ;
HOWDEN, CW ;
WILKINSON, J ;
HUNT, RH .
DIGESTION, 1992, 51 :59-67
[2]  
Castell DO, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P575
[3]   DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF OMEPRAZOLE (40 MG OD) VERSUS CIMETIDINE (400 MG QD) IN THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC EROSIVE REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS, ASSESSED ENDOSCOPICALLY, HISTOLOGICALLY AND BY 24 H PH MONITORING [J].
DEHN, TCB ;
SHEPHERD, HA ;
COLINJONES, D ;
KETTLEWELL, MGW ;
CARROLL, NJH .
GUT, 1990, 31 (05) :509-513
[4]   Lansoprazole in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in childhood [J].
Franco, MT ;
Salvia, G ;
Terrin, G ;
Spadaro, R ;
De Rosa, I ;
Iula, VD ;
Cucchiara, S .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2000, 32 (08) :660-666
[5]   Relation between oesophageal acid exposure and healing of oesophagitis with omeprazole in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis [J].
Holloway, RH ;
Dent, J ;
Narielvala, F ;
Mackinnon, AM .
GUT, 1996, 38 (05) :649-654
[6]  
Huang JQ, 1999, YALE J BIOL MED, V72, P181
[7]   Esomeprazole improves healing and symptom resolution as compared with omeprazole in reflux oesophagitis patients: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Kahrilas, PJ ;
Falk, GW ;
Johnson, DA ;
Schmitt, C ;
Collins, DW ;
Whipple, J ;
D'Amico, D ;
Hamelin, B ;
Joelsson, B .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 14 (10) :1249-1258
[8]   Esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily maintains intragastric pH&gt;4 for more than 80% of a 24-hour time period [J].
Katz, PO ;
Castell, DO ;
Chen, YS ;
Sostek, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (09) :S20-S21
[9]  
Katz PO, 2000, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V14, P709
[10]  
Labenz J, 1997, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V92, P576