Aesthetic and other values in the rural landscape

被引:10
作者
Benson, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Kendal LA9 4PD, Cumbria, England
关键词
aesthetics; beauty; utility; instrumental value; preservation;
D O I
10.3197/096327108X303864
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The paper discusses some relationships between aesthetic and non-aesthetic reasons for valuing rural landscape, i.e., landscape shaped by predominantly non-aesthetic purposes. The first part is about the relationship between aesthetic reasons and considerations of utility and argues for an intimate connection between them. The next part considers the relationship between aesthetic and other non-instrumental reasons for valuing landscape and argues that there are important contingent but no essential connections between them. The third part considers the strength or weakness of aesthetic reasons for resisting landscape changes that would result from changes in land use.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 238
页数:18
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PHILOS GEOGRAPHY, DOI DOI 10.1080/10903770125625
[2]  
Benson John, 2000, ENV ETHICS INTRO REA
[3]  
Brady E., 2003, AESTHETICS NATURAL E
[4]   The Aesthetics of Agricultural Landscapes and the Relationship between Humans and Nature . [J].
Brady, Emily .
ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 9 (01) :1-19
[5]  
CARLSON A, 1985, J AESTHETICS ART CRI, V43, P3001
[6]  
Collingwood Robin George, 1964, ESSAYS PHILOS ART
[7]   Nature connoisseurship [J].
Greenbaum, A .
ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES, 2005, 14 (03) :389-407
[8]  
HOLLAND A, 1996, 8 BANC LANC U PHIL D
[9]  
Hopkins G. M., 1948, The Poems of Gerard Manley Hopkins
[10]  
MOORE N, 1987, BIRD TIME SCI POLITI