Sources of variability in mercury flux measurements

被引:24
作者
Edwards, GC [1 ]
Rasmussen, PE
Schroeder, WH
Kemp, RJ
Dias, GM
Fitzgerald-Hubble, CR
Wong, EK
Halfpenny-Mitchell, L
Gustin, MS
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Geol Survey Canada, Nat Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Environm Canada, Atmospher Environm Serv, Downsview, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Nevada, Dept Environm & Resource Sci, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JD900496
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Chamber and micrometeorological mercury flux data collected during the Nevada STORMS intercomparison study were used to identify natural and methodological factors controlling, data variability. Micrometeorological and chamber measurements revealed that flux variability at a site is closely related to the Hg concentrations in the substrate, which were found to vary with mineral composition, grain size, and sampling depth. Environmental factors also influenced flux variability. Following two rainfall events, fluxes measured by chamber and micrometeorological methods increased substantially. The micrometeorological flux was enhanced five fold following the rain event. Fluxes measured by both methods were also influenced by net radiation and temperature as evidenced by their tendency to follow the diel cycle in these variables. Daytime fluxes were 6 times greater than nighttime fluxes. Data analysis revealed that interactions between environmental and geochemical variables complicate relationships between the flux and these variables. Understanding the variability at a flux monitoring site is important to establish relationships for scaling up and for the development of consistent sampling protocols that allow comparisons from one study to another and adequately quantify mercury fluxes from natural sites to provide representative emission data that can be used for scaling up to regional and global scales.
引用
收藏
页码:5421 / 5435
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Biogenic trace gases: Measuring emissions from soil and water
[2]  
BUSINGER JA, 1986, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V25, P1100, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<1100:EOTAWW>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
BUSINGER JA, 1971, J ATMOS SCI, V28, P181, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028<0181:FPRITA>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   FLUX-GRADIENT RELATIONSHIPS IN CONSTANT FLUX LAYER [J].
DYER, AJ ;
HICKS, BB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1970, 96 (410) :715-+
[7]  
EDWARDS GC, 1997, EOS T AGU S, V78, pS174
[8]   Experimental evaluation of analytical and Lagrangian surface-layer flux footprint models [J].
Finn, D ;
Lamb, B ;
Leclerc, MY ;
Horst, TW .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1996, 80 (03) :283-308
[9]   Nevada STORMS project: Measurement of mercury emissions from naturally enriched surfaces [J].
Gustin, MS ;
Lindberg, S ;
Marsik, F ;
Casimir, A ;
Ebinghaus, R ;
Edwards, G ;
Hubble-Fitzgerald, C ;
Kemp, R ;
Kock, H ;
Leonard, T ;
London, J ;
Majewski, M ;
Montecinos, C ;
Owens, J ;
Pilote, M ;
Poissant, L ;
Rasmussen, P ;
Schaedlich, F ;
Schneeberger, D ;
Schroeder, W ;
Sommar, J ;
Turner, R ;
Vette, A ;
Wallschlaeger, D ;
Xiao, Z ;
Zhang, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D17) :21831-21844
[10]   ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE MERCURY CONTAMINATED MILL TAILINGS IN THE CARSON RIVER DRAINAGE-BASIN, NV [J].
GUSTIN, MS ;
TAYLOR, GE ;
LEONARD, TL .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 80 (1-4) :217-220