Propofol for endoscopic sedation: a protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist

被引:123
作者
Cohen, LB [1 ]
Dubovsky, AN [1 ]
Aisenberg, J [1 ]
Miller, KM [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02010-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is increasing interest in the use of propofol, an ultrashort-acting hypnotic agent, for sedation during endoscopic examinations. A protocol was developed for administration of propofol, combined with small doses of midazolam and meperidine, for endoscopic sedation under the direction of a gastroenterologist. Initial experience with using this protocol is described. Methods: A total of 819 consecutive endoscopic examinations under sedation with propofol, midazolam, and meperidine (or fentanyl), in adherence with the sedation protocol, were reviewed retrospectively. Results: There were 638 colonoscopies and 181 EGDs; 89% of patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II. Mean dosages of medications were: propofol 63 (33.5) mg, meperidine 48 (7.2) mg, and midazolam 1 (0.12) mg. The dose of propofol was inversely correlated with age and ASA class, and positively correlated with patient weight and duration of examination. Hypotension (>20 mm Hg decline in either systolic or diastolic blood pressure) developed in 218 (27%) patients, and hypoxemia (oxygen saturation < 90%) developed in 75 (9%). All episodes of hypotension and hypoxemia were transient, and no patient required administration of a pharmacologic antagonist or assisted ventilation. The average time for recovery after colonoscopy and after EGD was, respectively, 25 minutes and 28 minutes. All EGDs and 98% of colonoscopies were completed successfully. Conclusions: On the basis of this initial experience, it is believed that propofol, potentiated by small doses of midazolam and meperidine, can be safely and effectively administered under the direction of a gastroenterologist. Additional research will be necessary to determine whether propofol is superior to the current methods of sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 732
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Bhardwaj G, 2002, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V97, P495
[2]   SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM [J].
CARLSSON, U ;
GRATTIDGE, P .
ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 27 (03) :240-243
[3]   Synergistic sedation with propofol and midazolam in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Carrasco, G ;
Cabré, L ;
Sobrepere, G ;
Costa, J ;
Molina, R ;
Cruspinera, A ;
Lacasa, C .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (05) :844-851
[4]   Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists [J].
Clarke, AC ;
Chiragakis, L ;
Hillman, LC ;
Kaye, GL .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (04) :158-161
[5]  
DAVILA ML, 2002, SLEISENGER FORDTRANS, P539
[6]  
Faigel DO, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P613
[7]   Propofol in the endoscopy suite: an anesthesiologist's perspective [J].
Graber, RG .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (06) :803-806
[8]  
Gross JB, 2002, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V96, P1004
[9]  
Heuss LT, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V55, pAB144
[10]  
HUG CC, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, pS21