Reserve design to maximize species persistence

被引:21
作者
Haight, Robert G. [1 ]
Travis, Laurel E. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA Forest Serv, No Res Stn, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Forestry, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
optimization; population viability; reserve site selection; resource allocation; search heuristic; simulation optimization; stochastic population model;
D O I
10.1007/s10666-007-9088-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We develop a reserve design strategy to maximize the probability of species persistence predicted by a stochastic, individual-based, metapopulation model. Because the population model does not fit exact optimization procedures, our strategy involves deriving promising solutions from theory, obtaining promising solutions from a simulation optimization heuristic, and determining the best of the promising solutions using a multiple-comparison statistical test. We use the strategy to address a problem of allocating limited resources to new and existing reserves. The best reserve design depends on emigration, dispersal mortality, and probabilities of movement between reserves. When movement probabilities are symmetric, the best design is to expand a subset of reserves to equal size to exhaust the habitat budget. When movement probabilities are not symmetric, the best design does not expand reserves to equal size and is strongly affected by movement probabilities and emigration rates. We use commercial simulation software to obtain our results.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 253
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Using ranking and selection to "clean up" after simulation optimization [J].
Boesel, J ;
Nelson, BL ;
Kim, SH .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 51 (05) :814-825
[2]   Managing landscapes for conservation under uncertainty [J].
Burgman, MA ;
Lindenmayer, DB ;
Elith, J .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (08) :2007-2017
[3]   Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Moilanen, A .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (05) :242-248
[4]   Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss [J].
Cabeza, M ;
Moilanen, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2003, 17 (05) :1402-1413
[5]   Dynamic reserve site selection [J].
Costello, C ;
Polasky, S .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :157-174
[6]   How much habitat is enough? [J].
Fahrig, L .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 100 (01) :65-74
[7]   Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: The relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement [J].
Flather, CH ;
Bevers, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 159 (01) :40-56
[8]   DISPERSAL OF WOLVES (CANIS-LUPUS) IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA, 1969-1989 [J].
GESE, EM ;
MECH, LD .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE ZOOLOGIE, 1991, 69 (12) :2946-2955
[9]  
Glover F.W., 1997, Tabu search
[10]  
Goldsman D, 1998, 1998 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, P159, DOI 10.1109/WSC.1998.744911