Who is responsible for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of medical devices? The role of independent technology assessment

被引:38
作者
Feldmon, Mitchell D. [1 ]
Petersen, Amy J. [1 ]
Korliner, Leoh S. [1 ]
Tice, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
medical technology; health professions; safety; health care quality;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-007-0275-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION. The global medical technology industry brings thousands of devices to market every year. However, significant gaps persist in the scientific literature, in the medical device approval process, and in the realm of postmarketing surveillance. Although thousands of drugs obtain approval only after review in randomized controlled trials, relatively few new medical devices are subject to comparable scrutiny. OBJECTIVE: To improve health outcomes, we must enhance our scrutiny of medical devices, and, without simply deferring to the Food and Drug Administration, we must ask ourselves: Who is responsible for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of medical devices? CONCLUSIONS: Technology assessments by independent organizations are a part of the solution to this challenge and may motivate further research focused on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ABELSON R, 2006, TOO SOON BREATHE EAS
[2]  
*ACCL INC, 2006, BALL SIN PAT TEST
[3]  
*AM COLL PHYS, PRINC PAT CENT MED H
[4]  
*AM RHIN SOC, 2006, AM RHIN SOC POS STAT
[5]   Paying for drug approvals - Who's using whom? [J].
Avorn, Jerry .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (17) :1697-1700
[6]   CT colonography for colon cancer screening [J].
Banerjee, S ;
Van Dam, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (01) :121-133
[7]  
Becker Cinda, 2004, Mod Healthc, V34, P17
[8]  
Berenson A, 2004, NY TIMES, pA32
[9]  
Berenson Alex, 2004, N Y Times Web, pA32
[10]   Bioethics, health, and inequality [J].
Berlinguer, G .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9439) :1086-1091