Curriculum assessment for prevention topics and the population perspective

被引:9
作者
Dismuke, SE
Burns, BW
Moranetz, CA
Ellerbeck, E
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Wichita, KS 67214 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Kansas City, KS USA
关键词
education; medical; undergraduate; curriculum; competency-based education; health promotion;
D O I
10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00295-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: According to the Association of American Medical College's (AAMC) Senior Questionnaire, medical students spend an inadequate amount of time learning about health promotion, disease prevention, and the population health perspective. Objective: Determine the health promotion/disease prevention (HPDP) content of the medical school curriculum at the University of Kansas School of Medicine, using an inventory of knowledge and skills in HPDP and using physician education objectives from Healthy People 2000. Methods: A 121-item survey to evaluate curriculum content was developed. All course directors evaluated their course by using this instrument. An average of three medical students used this instrument to assess each curriculum lecture and every clinical clerkship day in the required medical school curriculum. A teaching session was defined as spending a minimum of 3-5 minutes teaching an HPDP topic. Results: Of 21 required courses in the medical school curriculum, 11 accounted for the 393 teaching sessions in HPDP. Seventy-five percent (293 sessions) of these dealt with clinical prevention. Quantitative methods received 40 sessions, whereas the health services organization and delivery and the community dimensions of medical practice received 37 and 23 sessions, respectively. Course directors and students disagreed significantly in which HPDP topics were taught in the curriculum. Conclusions: Clinical prevention was fairly well covered in the medical school curriculum. Quantitative methods, health services organization and delivery, and community dimensions of medical practice were poorly covered. This assessment was used to substantially improve the curriculum. To track and improve curriculum content in all courses, course directors need to know more precise details about the content of their courses, so this detail can be used to better evaluate the overall curriculum.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 290
页数:5
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
*AAMC, 2001, AAMC CURR MAN INF TO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, NUTR TODAY
[3]  
*ASS AM MED COLL, 1998, RES 1998 MED SCH GRA, P3
[4]   Prevention education and evaluation in US medical schools: A status report [J].
Garr, DR ;
Lackland, DT ;
Wilson, DB .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (07) :S14-S21
[5]  
MOORE G, 1999, ACAD MED, V74, P128
[6]  
*USDHHS, 1990, HLTH PEOPL 2010
[7]   INVENTORY OF KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS RELATING TO DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION [J].
WALLACE, RB ;
WIESE, WH ;
LAWRENCE, RS ;
RUNYAN, JW ;
TILSON, HH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1990, 6 (01) :51-56