Correcting for bias in estimation of quantitative trait loci effects

被引:17
作者
Weller, JI [1 ]
Shlezinger, M [1 ]
Ron, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Org, Volcani Ctr, Inst Anim Sci, IL-50250 Bet Dagan, Israel
关键词
genetic markers; quantitative trait loci; genome scans; maximum likelihood; dairy cattle;
D O I
10.1051/gse:2005013
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Estimates of quantitative trait loci (QTL) effects derived from complete genome scans are biased, if no assumptions are made about the distribution of QTL effects. Bias should be reduced if estimates are derived by maximum likelihood, with the QTL effects sampled from a known distribution. The parameters of the distributions of QTL effects for nine economic traits in dairy cattle were estimated from a daughter design analysis of the Israeli Holstein population including 490 marker-by-sire contrasts. A separate gamma distribution was derived for each trait. Estimates for both the alpha and beta parameters and their SE decreased as a function of heritability. The maximum likelihood estimates derived for the individual QTL effects using the gamma distributions for each trait were regressed relative to the least squares estimates, but the regression factor decreased as a function of the least squares estimate. On simulated data, the mean of least squares estimates for effects with nominal 1% significance was more than twice the simulated values, while the mean of the maximum likelihood estimates was slightly lower than the mean of the simulated values. The coefficient of determination for the maximum likelihood estimates was five-fold the corresponding value for the least squares estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 522
页数:22
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias [J].
Allison, DB ;
Fernandez, JR ;
Heo, M ;
Zhu, SK ;
Etzel, C ;
Beasley, TM ;
Amos, CI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 70 (03) :575-585
[2]  
Beavis WD., 1994, P 49 ANN CORN SORGH, P250
[3]  
Beavis William D., 1998, P145
[4]  
Broman KW, 2001, LAB ANIMAL, V30, P44
[5]   Controlling the proportion of false positives in multiple dependent tests [J].
Fernando, RL ;
Nettleton, D ;
Southey, BR ;
Dekkers, JCM ;
Rothschild, MF ;
Soller, M .
GENETICS, 2004, 166 (01) :611-619
[6]   MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION USING BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION [J].
FERNANDO, RL ;
GROSSMAN, M .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1989, 21 (04) :467-477
[7]  
GEORGES M, 1995, GENETICS, V139, P907
[8]   Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans [J].
Göring, HHH ;
Terwilliger, JD ;
Blangero, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 69 (06) :1357-1369
[9]  
Hayes B, 2001, GENET SEL EVOL, V33, P209, DOI 10.1051/gse:2001117
[10]  
Henderson C. R., 1973, Proceedings of the Animal Breeding and Genetics Symposium in honor of Dr. Jay L. Lush, held July 29, 1972, at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia., P10