Equivalence of three or four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-day schedule in good-prognosis germ cell cancer:: A randomized study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer genitourinary tract cancer cooperative group and the medical research council

被引:243
作者
de Wit, R
Roberts, JT
Wilkinson, PM
de Mulder, PHM
Mead, GM
Fosså, SD
Cook, P
de Prijck, L
Stenning, S
Collette, L
机构
[1] Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Rotterdam Canc Inst, Dept Med Oncol, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Rotterdam Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nijmegen Hosp, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] No Ctr Canc Treatment, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] Christie Hosp, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Royal S Hants Hosp, Southampton SO9 4PE, Hants, England
[7] MRC, Canc Trials Off, London, England
[8] Norwegian Radium Hosp, Oslo, Norway
[9] European Org Res & Treatment Canc Data Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1629
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: to test the equivalence of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) and of the 5-day schedule versus 3 days per cycle in good-prognosis germ cell cancer. Patients and Methods: The study was designed as a 2 x 2 factorial trial. The aim was to rule out a 5% decrease in the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The study included the assessment of patient quality of life. A cycle of BEP consisted of etoposide 500 mg/m(2), administered at either 100 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 165 mg/m2 days 1 through 3, cisplatin 100 mg/m2, administered at either 20 mg/m(2) days 1 through 5 or 50 mg/m(2) days 1 and 2. Bleomycin 30 mg was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 during cycles 1 through 3. The randomization procedure allowed some investigators to participate only in the comparison of three versus four cycles. Results: From March 1995 until April 1998, 812 patients were randomly assigned to receive three or four cycles: of these, 681 were also randomly assigned to the 5-day or the 3-day schedule. Histology, marker values, and disease extent are well balanced in the treatment arms of the two comparisons. The projected 2-year PFS is 90.4% on three cycles and 89.4% on four cycles. The difference in PFS between three and four cycles is -1.0% (80% confidence limit [CL], -3.8%, +1.8%). Equivalence for three versus four cycles is chimed because both the upper and lower bounds of the 80% CL are less than 5%. In the 5- versus 3-day comparison, the projected 2-year PFS is 88.8% and 89.7%, respectively difference, -0.9%, (80% CL, -4.1%, +2.2%). Hence, equivalence is claimed in this comparison also. Frequencies of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were essentially similar. Quality of life was maintained better in patients receiving three cycles; no differences were defected between 3 and 5 days of treatment. Conclusion: We conclude that three cycles of BEP, with etoposide at 500 mg/m2, is sufficient therapy in good-prognosis germ cell cancer and that the administration of the chemotherapy in 3 days has no detrimental effect on the effectiveness of the BEP regimen. (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1629 / 1640
页数:12
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF CRITERIA FOR ASSIGNING GERM-CELL TUMOR PATIENTS TO GOOD RISK AND POOR RISK STUDIES [J].
BAJORIN, D ;
KATZ, A ;
CHAN, E ;
GELLER, N ;
VOGELZANG, N ;
BOSL, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (05) :786-792
[2]   Bleomycin in germ cell tumor therapy: Not all regimens are created equal [J].
Bajorin, DF ;
Bosl, GJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :1717-1719
[3]  
COMNOUGUE C, 1993, STAT MED, V12, P1353, DOI 10.1002/sim.4780121407
[4]   Importance of bleomycin in combination chemotherapy for good-prognosis testicular nonseminoma: A randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Tract Cancer Cooperative Group [J].
deWit, R ;
Stoter, G ;
Kaye, SB ;
Sleijfer, DT ;
Jones, WG ;
Huinink, WWT ;
Rea, LA ;
Collette, L ;
Sylvester, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :1837-1843
[5]   TREATMENT OF TESTICULAR CANCER - A NEW AND IMPROVED MODEL [J].
EINHORN, LH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (11) :1777-1781
[6]   Patients' and doctors' perception of long-term morbidity in patients with testicular cancer clinical stage I - A descriptive pilot study [J].
Fossa, SD ;
Moynihan, C ;
Serbouti, S .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1996, 4 (02) :118-128
[7]   Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: A multiinstitutional Medical Research Council European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial [J].
Horwich, A ;
Sleijfer, DT ;
Fossa, SD ;
Kaye, SB ;
Oliver, RTD ;
Cullen, MH ;
Mead, GM ;
deWit, R ;
deMulder, PHM ;
Dearnaley, DP ;
Cook, PA ;
Sylvester, RJ ;
Stenning, SP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (05) :1844-1852
[8]  
Mead GM, 1997, J CLIN ONCOL, V15, P594
[9]  
PECKHAM MJ, 1971, MANAGEMENT TESTICULA, P89
[10]   Long-term follow-up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: The Indiana University experience [J].
Saxman, SB ;
Finch, D ;
Gonin, R ;
Einhorn, LH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (02) :702-706