Analysis of BoLA class II microsatellites in cattle infested with Boophilus microplus ticks:: class II is probably associated with susceptibility

被引:30
作者
Acosta-Rodrígiez, R
Alonso-Morales, R
Balladares, S
Flores-Aguilar, H
García-Vazquez, Z
Gorodezky, C
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, Ctr Ensenanza Invest & Extens Granaderia Trop, Mexico City 93600, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, Genet Mol Lab, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] INDRE, Dept Immunol & Immunogenet, Mexico City 11340, DF, Mexico
[4] Inst Nacl Invest Forestales Agr & Pecuarias, CENID, PAVET, Morelos 62550, Mexico
关键词
bovine resistance/susceptibility; microsatellites STRs; BoLA class II; Boophilus microplus; bovine MHC;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.10.007
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the role of certain bovine lymphocyte antigens (BoLA) regions in the resistance or susceptibility to Boophilus microplus tick infestation in two different breeds of cattle. The breeds were maintained, one in natural conditions and the second one in an experimental setting at the research station in Martinez de la Torre, Veracruz, Mexico. The study took place from June to August 2001 (natural infestation) using 33 crossbreed steers (crossbreed is here defined as 3/4 European = 1/2 Simmenthal x 1/4 Holstein x 1/4 Zebu, a cross resulting from F1 x Simmenthal), ranging from 15 to 20 months old. Fifty-nine F1 cows (1/2 Holstein x 1/2 Zebu) were included in the experimental setting, infested and followed during 25 days in November 2001 and 2002. Experiment A included thirty-one 2-7-year-old F1 cows, and experiment B included twenty-eight 18-24-month-old F1 heifers. Both groups were analysed separately and were not comparable because of the different infestation methods and genetic background. All ticks >= 4 mm long were counted on the total body of F1 animals and on one side of the 3/4 European steers. In this case, susceptible animals were defined when having ticks = X + 1S.D. (29 +/- 16). In the experimental setting susceptibility was defined when the number of ticks was over the 75 percentile (>= 79). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples of all animals. The BoLA DRB3, DRBP1, RM185 and BM1815 microsatellite loci were amplified using a PCR method. Genescan software was used for analysis in an ABI sequencer. The SPSS statistical program was used and the comparisons were assessed using the Fisher's exact test. In the naturally infested animals, DRB3-184 was found positively associated with tick infestation (P = 0.018; Pc = NS; OR = 5; EF = 28%). DRBP1 - 128 was also found to be increased (P = 0.03; Pc = NS; OR = 6; EF = 42%). In the experimentally infested animals, two more loci were found to be associated, BM1815-152 (P = 0.01; Pc = NS; OR = 15; EF = 74%) and DRBP1-130 (P = 0.05; Pc = NS; OR = 4; EF = 77%). None of them remained significant after correction, indicating that a larger sample size is needed to confirm the results. This is the first study showing MHC genes associated with tick infestation based on class 11 microsatellite polymorphisms. Further studies are needed to confirm the susceptibility traits and to determine haplotype segregation in families. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 321
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
CARRINGTON M, 1999, MICROSATELLITES EVOL, P225
[2]   Nomenclature for factors of the BoLA system, 1996: Report of the ISAG BoLA Nomenclature Committee [J].
Davies, CJ ;
Andersson, L ;
Ellis, SA ;
Hensen, EJ ;
Lewin, HA ;
Mikko, S ;
MuggliCockett, NE ;
vanderPoel, JJ ;
Russell, GC .
ANIMAL GENETICS, 1997, 28 (03) :159-168
[3]  
DAVIES CJ, 1992, P 5 INT BOV LYM ANT, P1
[4]   Vaccination against ticks (Boophilus spp.):: the experience with the Bm86-based vaccine Gavac™ [J].
de la Fuente, J ;
Rodríguez, M ;
Montero, C ;
Redondo, M ;
García-García, JC ;
Méndez, L ;
Serrano, E ;
Valdés, M ;
Enríquez, A ;
Canales, M ;
Ramos, E ;
Boué, O ;
Machado, H ;
Lleonart, R .
GENETIC ANALYSIS-BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING, 1999, 15 (3-5) :143-148
[5]  
DELAFUENTE J, 1992, TROP ANIM HLTH PROD, V24, P81
[6]  
ELLEGREN H, 1993, ANIM GENET, V24, P269, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1993.tb00310.x
[7]   Towards a permanent solution for controlling cattle ticks [J].
Frisch, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 1999, 29 (01) :57-71
[8]   Control of ticks resistant to immunization with Bm86 in cattle vaccinated with the recombinant antigen Bm95 isolated from the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus [J].
García-García, JC ;
Montero, C ;
Redondo, M ;
Vargas, M ;
Canales, M ;
Boue, O ;
Rodríguez, M ;
Joglar, M ;
Machado, H ;
González, IL ;
Valdés, M ;
Méndez, L ;
de la Fuente, J .
VACCINE, 2000, 18 (21) :2275-2287
[9]  
GLOWATZKIMULLIS ML, 1995, ANIM GENET, V26, P7, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1995.tb02612.x
[10]  
GREEN RS, 2002, EPIDEMIOLOGIA MED, P111