Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris

被引:51
作者
Carrié, D [1 ]
Khalifé, K [1 ]
Citron, B [1 ]
Izaaz, K [1 ]
Hamon, M [1 ]
Juiliard, JM [1 ]
Leclercq, F [1 ]
Fourcade, J [1 ]
Lipiecki, J [1 ]
Sabatier, R [1 ]
Boulet, V [1 ]
Rinaldi, JP [1 ]
Mourali, J [1 ]
Sabatier, R [1 ]
Boulet, V [1 ]
Rinaldi, JP [1 ]
Mourali, S [1 ]
Fatouch, M [1 ]
El Mokhtar, E [1 ]
Aboujaoudé, F [1 ]
Elbaz, M [1 ]
Grolleau, R [1 ]
Steg, PG [1 ]
Puel, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Purpan, Dept Cardiol, F-31059 Toulouse, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01485-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with and without balloon predilatation on duration of the procedure, reduction of procedure-related costs, and clinical outcomes. Although preliminary trials of direct coronary stenting have demonstrated promising results, the lack of randomized studies with long-term follow-up has limited the critical evaluation of the role of direct stenting in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Between January and September 1999, 338 patients were randomly assigned to either direct stent implantation (DS+; 173 patients) or standard stent implantation with balloon predilatation (DS-; 165 patients). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Procedural success was achieved in 98.3% of patients assigned to DSS and 97.5% of patients assigned to DS- (p = NS), with a crossover rate of 13.9%. Compared with DS-, DSS conferred a dramatic reduction in procedure-related cost ($956.4 +/- $352.2 vs $1,164.6 +/- $383.9, p <0.0001) and duration of the procedure (424.2 +/- 412.1 vs 634.5 +/- 390.1 seconds, p <0.0001). At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events including death, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, repeat angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 5.3% in DS+ and 11.4% in DS- (p = NS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that major adverse cardiac events rates were related to stent length of 10 mm (relative risk [RR] 3.25, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.36 to 7.78; p = 0.008), stent diameter of 3 mm (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.03 to 7.06; p = 0.043), and complex lesion type C (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.02 to 7.85; p = 0.045). Thus, in selected patients, this prospective randomized study shows the feasibility of DS+ with reduction in procedural cost and length, and without an increase in in-hospital clinical events and major adverse cardiac events at 6-month follow-up. (C) 2001 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 698
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   CORONARY RESTENOSIS - EVALUATION OF A RESTENOSIS INJURY INDEX IN A SWINE MODEL [J].
BONAN, R ;
PAIEMENT, P ;
SCORTICHINI, D ;
CLOUTIER, MJ ;
LEUNG, TK .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 126 (06) :1334-1340
[2]   Direct coronary stenting without predilation [J].
Briguori, C ;
Sheiban, I ;
De Gregorio, J ;
Anzuini, A ;
Montorfano, M ;
Pagnotta, P ;
Marsico, F ;
Leonardo, F ;
Di Mario, C ;
Colombo, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 34 (07) :1910-1915
[3]  
CARRIE D, 2001, IN PRESS J INTERVENT
[4]   ECONOMICS OF ELECTIVE CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION - COMPARISON OF COSTS AND CHARGES FOR CONVENTIONAL ANGIOPLASTY, DIRECTIONAL ATHERECTOMY, STENTING AND BYPASS-SURGERY [J].
COHEN, DJ ;
BREALL, JA ;
HO, KKL ;
WEINTRAUB, RM ;
KUNTZ, RE ;
WEINSTEIN, MC ;
BAIM, DS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 22 (04) :1052-1059
[5]   EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF STENTING AS A TREATMENT FOR SYMPTOMATIC SINGLE-VESSEL CORONARY-DISEASE - USE OF A DECISION-ANALYTIC MODEL [J].
COHEN, DJ ;
BREALL, JA ;
HO, KKL ;
KUNTZ, RE ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
BAIM, DS ;
WEINSTEIN, MC .
CIRCULATION, 1994, 89 (04) :1859-1874
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]   Stent implantation without predilation in patients with a single, noncalcified coronary artery lesion [J].
Danzi, GB ;
Capuano, C ;
Fiocca, L ;
Dallavalle, F ;
Pirelli, S ;
Mauri, L ;
Quaini, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (10) :1250-+
[8]   DOES THE USE OF NEW INTRACORONARY INTERVENTIONAL DEVICES PROLONG RADIATION EXPOSURE IN THE CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY [J].
FEDERMAN, J ;
BELL, MR ;
WONDROW, MA ;
GRILL, DE ;
HOLMES, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (02) :347-351
[9]  
Figulla HR, 1998, CATHETER CARDIO DIAG, V43, P245, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199803)43:3<245::AID-CCD1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-9