A nonclonogenic cytotoxicity assay using primary cultures of patient tumor cells for anticancer drug screening

被引:8
作者
Dhar, S
Gullbo, J
Nilsson, K
Nygren, P
Larsson, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Div Clin Pharmacol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Pathol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Oncol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1177/108705719800300307
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Primary cultures of cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and ovarian carcinoma (Ovca) were compared with the renal carcinoma ACHN and the lymphocytic CCRF-CEM human tumor cell lines in response to 63 toxic or nontoxic compounds. The experiments were conducted at 1, 10, and 100 mu g/ml in 96-well microtiter plates for an assay time of 72 h. The plates were analyzed by the fully automated Dynatech Immune Assay System (DIAS) using Alamar blue as a fluorometric/colorimetric indicator of metabolic activity. Drug response data were reported as the area under the tumor cell survival-concentration curve (AUC). Noncytotoxic compounds were classified as inactive by all cell systems. According to the AUG, CCRF-CEM and CLL cells were the most sensitive, followed by ACHN, and then Ovca, Many of the clinically active drugs were detected by all cell systems. However, the sensitivity pattern differed considerably between the cell types as judged from correlation analysis, and a higher proportion of clinically inactive drugs were scored as active by the cell lines compared with the primary cultures. Ovca showed the highest ratio of clinically solid tumor active/clinically inactive agents followed by CLL. The results indicate that primary cultures of human tumor cells may be a useful and valuable model for anticancer drug screening.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 216
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   A NEW RAPID AND SIMPLE NONRADIOACTIVE ASSAY TO MONITOR AND DETERMINE THE PROLIFERATION OF LYMPHOCYTES - AN ALTERNATIVE TO [H-3] THYMIDINE INCORPORATION ASSAY [J].
AHMED, SA ;
GOGAL, RM ;
WALSH, JE .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1994, 170 (02) :211-224
[2]  
ALLEY MC, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P589
[3]   THE CELL BIOLOGY OF MULTIPLE-DRUG RESISTANCE [J].
BECK, WT .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 36 (18) :2879-2887
[4]  
BORDEN EC, 1982, CANCER RES, V42, P4948
[5]  
CSOKA K, 1995, SEMIN ONCOL, V22, P47
[6]   CYTOTOXIC DRUG-SENSITIVITY TESTING OF TUMOR-CELLS FROM PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CARCINOMA USING THE FLUOROMETRIC MICROCULTURE CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY (FMCA) [J].
CSOKA, K ;
LARSSON, R ;
THOLANDER, B ;
GERDIN, E ;
DELATORRE, M ;
NYGREN, P .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 54 (02) :163-170
[7]  
Csoka K, 1997, INT J CANCER, V72, P1008
[8]  
DEVITA VT, 1997, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V1, P333
[9]   Anti-cancer drug characterisation using a human cell line panel representing defined types of drug resistance [J].
Dhar, S ;
Nygren, P ;
Csoka, K ;
Botling, J ;
Nilsson, K ;
Larsson, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 74 (06) :888-896
[10]   THE NATIONAL-CANCER-CHEMOTHERAPY-PROGRAM [J].
FREI, E .
SCIENCE, 1982, 217 (4560) :600-606