Controls on the channel width of rivers: Implications for modeling fluvial incision of bedrock

被引:264
作者
Finnegan, NJ
Roe, G
Montgomery, DR
Hallet, B
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Quaternary Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
fluvial geomorphology; tectonic geomorphology; channel width; river incision; landscape evolution;
D O I
10.1130/G21171.1
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
On the basis of the Manning equation and basic mass conservation principles, we derive an expression for scaling the steady-state width (W) of river channels as a function of discharge (Q), channel slope (S), roughness (n), and width-to-depth ratio (01): W = [alpha(alpha + 2)(2/3)](3/8)Q(3/8)S-(3/16)n(3)/(8). We propose that channel width-to-depth ratio, in addition to roughness, is a function of the material in which the channel is developed, and that where a river is confined to a given material, width-to-depth ratio and roughness can be assumed constant. Given these simplifications, the expression emulates traditional width-discharge relationships for rivers incising bedrock with uniformly concave fluvial long profiles. More significantly, this relationship describes river width trends in terrain with spatially nonuniform rock uplift rates, where conventional discharge-based width scaling laws are inadequate. We suggest that much of observed channel width variability in river channels confined by bedrock is a simple consequence of the tendency for water to flow faster in steeper reaches and therefore occupy smaller channel cross sections. We demonstrate that using conventional scaling relationships for channel width can result in underestimation of stream-power variability in channels incising bedrock and that our model improves estimates of spatial patterns of bedrock incision rates.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 232
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INST CIV ENG T
[2]   Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas [J].
Burbank, DW ;
Leland, J ;
Fielding, E ;
Anderson, RS ;
Brozovic, N ;
Reid, MR ;
Duncan, C .
NATURE, 1996, 379 (6565) :505-510
[3]   Statistical development and validation of discharge equations for natural channels [J].
Dingman, SL ;
Sharma, KP .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1997, 199 (1-2) :13-35
[4]  
Finlayson DP, 2002, GEOLOGY, V30, P219, DOI 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0219:SCORIE>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   STREAM GRADIENT AS A FUNCTION OF ORDER, MAGNITUDE, AND DISCHARGE [J].
FLINT, JJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1974, 10 (05) :969-973
[7]   Downstream hydraulic geometry and hydraulic similitude [J].
Griffiths, GA .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2003, 39 (04) :ESG31-ESG36
[8]   Distribution of active rock uplift along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Inferences from bedrock channel longitudinal profiles [J].
Kirby, E ;
Whipple, KX ;
Tang, WQ ;
Chen, ZL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2003, 108 (B4)
[9]   Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal [J].
Lavé, J ;
Avouac, JP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2001, 106 (B11) :26561-26591
[10]   Downstream variations in the width of bedrock channels [J].
Montgomery, DR ;
Gran, KB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (06) :1841-1846