Integrating medical management with diabetes self-management training - A randomized control trial of the Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment program

被引:100
作者
Polonsky, WH
Earles, J
Smith, S
Pease, DJ
Macmillan, M
Christensen, R
Taylor, T
Dickert, J
Jackson, RA
机构
[1] Joslin Diabet Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
[4] Pearl Harbor Naval Med Clin, Honolulu, HI USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.26.11.3048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - This study evaluated, the Diabetes Outpatient Intensive Treatment (DOIT) program, a multiday group education and skills training experience combined with daily medical. management, followed by case management over 6 months. Using a randomized control design, the study explored how DOIT affected glycemic control and self-care behaviors over a short term. The impact of two additional factors on clinical outcomes were also examined (frequency of case management contacts and whether or not insulin was started during the program). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Patients with type I and type 2 diabetes in poor glycemic control (Alc >8.5%) were randomly assigned to DOIT or a second condition, entitled EDUPOST, which was standard diabetes care with the addition of quarterly educational mailings. A total of 167 patients (78 EDUPOST, 89 DOIT). completed all baseline measures, including Alc and a questionnaire assessing diabetes-related self-care behaviors. At 6 months, 117 patients (52 EDUPOST, 65 DOIT) returned to complete a follow-up Alc and the identical self-care questionnaire. RESULTS- At follow-up, DOIT evidenced a significantly greater drop in Alc than EDUPOST. DOIT patients also reported significantly more frequent blood glucose monitoring and greater attention to carbohydrate and fat contents (ACFC) of food compared with EDUPOST patients. An increase in ACFC over the 6-month period was associated with improved glycemic control among DOIT patients. Also, the frequency of nurse case manager follow-up contacts was positively linked to better Alc outcomes. The addition of insulin did not appear to be a significant contributor to glycemic change. CONCLUSIONS - DOIT appears to be effective in promoting better diabetes care and positively influencing glycemia and diabetes-related self-care behaviors. However, it demands significant time, commitment, and careful coordination with many health care professionals. The role of the nurse case manager in providing ongoing follow-up contact seems important.
引用
收藏
页码:3048 / 3053
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study [J].
Adler, AI ;
Stratton, IM ;
Neil, HAW ;
Yudkin, JS ;
Matthews, DR ;
Cull, CA ;
Wright, AD ;
Turner, RC ;
Holman, RR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7258) :412-419
[2]  
Gerstein HC, 2000, LANCET, V355, P253
[3]  
Jackson RA, 1999, DIABETES, V48, pA422
[4]   Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes - A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control [J].
Norris, SL ;
Lau, J ;
Smith, SJ ;
Schmid, CH ;
Engelgau, MM .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (07) :1159-1171
[5]   Effectiveness of self management training in type 2 diabetes - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Norris, SL ;
Engelgau, MM ;
Narayan, KMV .
DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (03) :561-587
[6]   The evidence for the effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy in diabetes management [J].
Pastors, JG ;
Warshaw, H ;
Daly, A ;
Franz, M ;
Kulkarni, K .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (03) :608-613
[7]   THE EFFECT OF INTENSIVE TREATMENT OF DIABETES ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION OF LONG-TERM COMPLICATIONS IN INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES-MELLITUS [J].
SHAMOON, H ;
DUFFY, H ;
FLEISCHER, N ;
ENGEL, S ;
SAENGER, P ;
STRELZYN, M ;
LITWAK, M ;
WYLIEROSETT, J ;
FARKASH, A ;
GEIGER, D ;
ENGEL, H ;
FLEISCHMAN, J ;
POMPI, D ;
GINSBERG, N ;
GLOVER, M ;
BRISMAN, M ;
WALKER, E ;
THOMASHUNIS, A ;
GONZALEZ, J ;
GENUTH, S ;
BROWN, E ;
DAHMS, W ;
PUGSLEY, P ;
MAYER, L ;
KERR, D ;
LANDAU, B ;
SINGERMAN, L ;
RICE, T ;
NOVAK, M ;
SMITHBREWER, S ;
MCCONNELL, J ;
DROTAR, D ;
WOODS, D ;
KATIRGI, B ;
LITVENE, M ;
BROWN, C ;
LUSK, M ;
CAMPBELL, R ;
LACKAYE, M ;
RICHARDSON, M ;
LEVY, B ;
CHANG, S ;
HEINHEINEMANN, M ;
BARRON, S ;
ASTOR, L ;
LEBECK, D ;
BRILLON, D ;
DIAMOND, B ;
VASILASDWOSKIN, A ;
LAURENZI, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (14) :977-986
[8]  
Shannon H, 2000, NEW ENGL J MED, V342, P381
[9]  
Stearne MR, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P703
[10]  
Toobert D.J., 1994, Handbook of psychology and diabetes: A guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice, P351