Evidence for the application of rules in Pavlovian electrodermal conditioning with humans

被引:19
作者
Lachnit, H [1 ]
Lober, K [1 ]
Reinhard, G [1 ]
Kinder, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Marburg, Dept Psychol, D-35032 Marburg, Germany
关键词
Pavlovian conditioning; skin conductance response; humans; nonlinear discriminations;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00067-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two Pavlovian SCR conditioning experiments investigated interference effects in sequential training of positive and negative patterning discriminations in humans. In Experiment 1, positive patterning (A -, B -, AB +) was trained in Phase 1, immediately followed by a negative patterning schedule (C +, D +, CD -). We predicted that human participants would learn a specific numerosity rule in positive patterning, which interferes with the subsequent negative patterning schedule. In Experiment 2, negative patterning (C +, D +, CD -) was trained in Phase 1, followed by a positive patterning schedule (A -. B -, AB +) in Phase 2. Because human participants would learn an abstract 'separate-versus-together'- or 'opposite'-rule to solve the negative patterning discrimination in Phase 1, there should be less interference in positive patterning in Phase 2 where the separate/together-rule could be applied, too. In both experiments, the initial patterning discriminations were acquired successfully. In Experiment 1, human participants totally failed to solve the Phase 2 discrimination, while in Experiment 2 appropriate response differentiation developed in Phase 2. Thus, without pre-experience human participants seem to utilize a specific numerosity-rule in positive patterning and a separate/together-rule in negative patterning. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 166
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THEORIES COGNITIVE P
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, TECHNIQUES PSYCHOPHY
[3]   SUMMATION AND CONFIGURATION IN PATTERNING SCHEDULES WITH THE RAT AND RABBIT [J].
BELLINGHAM, WP ;
GILLETTEBELLINGHAM, K ;
KEHOE, EJ .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1985, 13 (02) :152-164
[4]  
DEISIG N, 2001, IN PRESS CONFIGURAL
[5]   CONTINGENCY THEORY AND CLASSICAL AUTONOMIC EXCITATORY AND INHIBITORY CONDITIONING - SOME PROBLEMS OF ASSESSMENT AND INTERPRETATION [J].
FUREDY, JJ ;
POULOS, CX ;
SCHIFFMANN, K .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 12 (01) :98-105
[6]   ON METHODS IN THE ANALYSIS OF PROFILE DATA [J].
GREENHOUSE, SW ;
GEISSER, S .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1959, 24 (02) :95-112
[7]   ATTRIBUTE-LEARNING AND RULE-LEARNING ASPECTS OF CONCEPTUAL BEHAVIOR [J].
HAYGOOD, RC ;
BOURNE, LE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1965, 72 (03) :175-195
[8]   CROSS-MODAL TRANSFER AS A FUNCTION OF SIMILARITIES BETWEEN TRAINING TASKS IN CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF THE RABBIT [J].
HOLT, PE ;
KEHOE, EJ .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1985, 13 (01) :51-59
[10]   CONFIGURATION AND COMBINATION LAWS IN CONDITIONING WITH COMPOUND STIMULI [J].
KEHOE, EJ ;
GORMEZANO, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1980, 87 (02) :351-378