Accounting choice and future performance: The case of R&D accounting in France

被引:56
作者
Cazavan-Jeny, Anne [1 ,2 ]
Jeanjean, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
Joos, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] ESSEC Business Sch, Singapore 188064, Singapore
[2] ESSEC Business Sch, Paris, France
[3] Morgan Stanley Asia Ltd, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
VALUE-RELEVANCE; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; CAPITALIZATION; SELECTION; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.016
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine whether managers' decisions to capitalize or expense R&D expenditures convey information about the future performance of the firm. Focusing on a French setting where managers can choose to capitalize R&D expenditures under certain circumstances, we find that, after controlling for industry effects, firms that capitalize R&D expenditures spend less on R&D, have more volatile R&D efforts, and are smaller and more leveraged than firms that expense R&D expenditures. We also find that capitalizers capitalize R&D outlays when they need to meet or beat thresholds. Finally, we show that the decision to capitalize R&D is generally associated with a negative or neutral impact on future performance, even after controlling for self-selection. Our results also show that when firms both capitalize and expense R&D expenditures, the expensed portion exhibits a stronger (and negative) relationship with future performance. Market-based tests corroborate these findings. While we cannot unambiguously establish whether our findings imply that management uses R&D capitalization to manage earnings or because it is unable to estimate the earning power of R&D projects, our results suggest that management is unable to truthfully convey information about future performance through its decision to capitalize R&D. Our findings, based on real data as opposed to simulated data, therefore contrast with previous supportive evidence in favor of capitalization in the literature. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 165
页数:21
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization [J].
Aboody, D ;
Lev, B .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1998, 36 :161-191
[2]  
*AIMR, 1993, FIN REP 1900S
[3]  
[Anonymous], J ACCOUNTING PUBLIC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1974, STAT FIN ACC STAND N
[5]   Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness [J].
Ball, R ;
Shivakumar, L .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2005, 39 (01) :83-128
[6]  
Boone JeffP., 2001, J ACCOUNT PUBLIC POL, V20, P97, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00023-0
[7]  
Burgstahler DC, 1997, ACCOUNT REV, V72, P187
[8]  
Bushee BJ, 1998, ACCOUNT REV, V73, P305
[9]  
Callimaci A., 2004, Can Acc Perspect, V3, P33
[10]   On the global acceptance of IAS/IFRS accounting standards: The logic and implications of the principles-based system [J].
Carmona, Salvador ;
Trombetta, Marco .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2008, 27 (06) :455-461