The role of students' motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC

被引:247
作者
de Barba, P. G. [1 ,2 ]
Kennedy, G. E. [1 ,2 ]
Ainley, M. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Ctr Study Higher Educ, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Psychol Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
learning analytics; MOOC; motivation; participation; performance; persistence; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; PERSISTENCE; VALUES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12130
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Over the last 5years, massive open online courses (MOOCs) have increasingly provided learning opportunities across the world in a variety of domains. As with many emerging educational technologies, why and how people come to MOOCs needs to be better understood and importantly what factors contribute to learners' MOOC performance. It is known that online learning environments require greater levels of self-regulation, and that high levels of motivation are crucial to activate these skills. However, motivation is a complex construct and research on how it functions in MOOCs is still in its early stages. Research presented in this article investigated how motivation and participation influence students' performance in a MOOC, more specifically those students who persist to the end of the MOOC. Findings indicated that the strongest predictor of performance was participation, followed by motivation. Motivation influenced and was influenced by students' participation during the course. Moreover, situational interest played a crucial role in mediating the impact of general intrinsic motivation and participation on performance. The results are discussed in relation to how educators and designers of MOOCs can use knowledge emerging from motivational assessments and participation measures gleaned from learning analytics to tailor the design and delivery of courses. (c) 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 231
页数:14
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities [J].
Ainley, Mary ;
Patrick, Lyn .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 18 (03) :267-286
[2]   Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes [J].
Ainley, Mary .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 18 (04) :391-405
[3]  
Ainley M, 2010, ADV MOTIV A, V16, P235, DOI 10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A010
[4]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MOOCS OPEN ED IMPLIC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 1 ACM C LEARN SCAL, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2556325.2566237, 10.1145/2556325.2566237]
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P 3 INT C LEARN AN K
[8]   Motivation and Transfer: The Role of Mastery-Approach Goals in Preparation for Future Learning [J].
Belenky, Daniel M. ;
Nokes-Malach, Timothy J. .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2012, 21 (03) :399-432
[9]   Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention [J].
Blackwell, Lisa S. ;
Trzesniewski, Kali H. ;
Dweck, Carol Sorich .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 78 (01) :246-263
[10]   BOOTSTRAPPING GOODNESS-OF-FIT MEASURES IN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS [J].
BOLLEN, KA ;
STINE, RA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :205-229