Differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the ATP-III and WHO definitions

被引:25
作者
Cosmea, AA
Fernández, VL
García, SS
García, TA
Díaz, MAP
González, LD
机构
[1] Ctr Salud Ventanielles Colloto, Oviedo 33010, Spain
[2] Ctr Salud Vallobin Concinos, Oviedo, Spain
来源
MEDICINA CLINICA | 2005年 / 124卷 / 10期
关键词
prevalence; metabolic syndrome; diagnosis; primary care;
D O I
10.1157/13072570
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to know the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome (MS), as well as to know the differences in its prevalence according to the Adult Treatment Panel of the National Cholesterol Education Program (ATP-III) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Cross-sectional descriptive study performed in primary care in population of both sexes aged between 40 and 74 years. Variables studied were risk factors as well as each one of the components of MS, according to both definitions. RESULTS: We studied 358 patients, 161 (45%) men and 197 women. The prevalence of MS using the WHO criteria was 17.9% and according with the ATP-III criteria it was 23,5%. The prevalence increased with age and the body mass index. Both definitions agreed in the classification of MS in 80% of cases (kappa = 0.38). If we considered the definition of MS according to the WHO taken as the << gold standard >>, the ATP-III definition displays a sensitivity of 59.4%, specificity of 84.4% and negative predictive value of 90.5%. The agreement is greater in women and older than 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MS is smaller with the WHO criteria. The agreement between both methods is scarce and the clinical application of the ATP-III criteria in primary care needs its homologation with clinic-epidemiologal studies.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 370
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
Analysis of the agreement between the World Health Organization criteria and the national cholesterol education program-III definition of the metabolic syndrome [J].
Aguilar-Salinas, CA ;
Rojas, R ;
Gómez-Pérez, FJ ;
Valles, V ;
Ríos-Torres, JM ;
Franco, A ;
Olaiz, G ;
Rull, JA ;
Sepulveda, J .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (05) :1635-1635
[2]
Insulin resistance quantification by fasting insulin plasma values and HOMA index in a non-diabetic population [J].
Ascaso, JF ;
Romero, P ;
Real, JT ;
Priego, A ;
Valdecabres, C ;
Carmena, R .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2001, 117 (14) :530-533
[3]
Epidemic of metabolic diseases. A warning call [J].
Banegas, JR ;
Ruilope, LM .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2003, 120 (03) :99-100
[4]
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults - Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [J].
Ford, ES ;
Giles, WH ;
Dietz, WH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (03) :356-359
[5]
A comparison of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome using two proposed definitions [J].
Ford, ES ;
Giles, WH .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (03) :575-581
[6]
León EEA, 2003, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V120, P172, DOI 10.1157/13043145
[7]
*NIH, 2002, 3 REP NCEP EXP PAN D
[8]
Insulin resistance and its involvement in multiple risk factors associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Rios, MS ;
Gimilio, JFA ;
Fernández, EB ;
Cerrato, JC ;
Rodríguez, RC ;
Jiménez, FE ;
Fernández-Real, JM ;
Sánchez, RG ;
de Barberá, RG ;
Aragón, CG ;
Pombo, JLH ;
Sánchez, LFP ;
Vilalta, NP ;
Engel, WR ;
Loscos, AR ;
Olarte, AZ .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2002, 119 (12) :458-463
[9]
Silva LC, 1994, EXCURSION REGRESION, P97
[10]
*WHO, 1999, DEF DIAG CLASS DIAB