CT colonography: Single-versus multi-detector row imaging

被引:126
作者
Hara, AK
Johnson, CD
MacCarty, RL
Welch, TJ
McCollough, CH
Harmen, WS
机构
[1] Edward Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Diagnost Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Biostat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
colon; CT; colon neoplasms; diagnosis; colonoscopy; computed tomography (CT); comparative studies; helical;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma28461
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare respiratory artifacts, colonic distention, and polyp detection at computed tomographic (CT) colonography by using single- and multi-detector row helical CT systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 237 consecutive patients received subcutaneously administered glucagon and underwent prone and supine CT colonography with single-detector row CT (n = 77) and multi-detector row CT (n = 160), followed by colonoscopy. Examination results were graded for colonic distention, respiratory artifacts, and polyp depiction by two radiologists working independently. RESULTS: Suboptimal colonic distention was significantly more common with single-detector row CT and was present in at least one segment in 52% (40 of 77 patients) of examinations versus only 19% (30 of 160 patients) with multi-detector row CT (P < .001). Mild respiratory artifacts were present in 61% (47 of 77 patients) of single-detector row CT examinations versus only 16% (26 of 160 patients) of multi-detector row CT examinations (P < .001). Depiction of polyps larger than 10 mm was 89% (eight of nine polyps) for single-detector row CT and 80% (eight of 10 polyps) for multi-detector row CT (P > .05). CONCLUSION: CT colonography performed with multi-detector row CT significantly improved the demonstration of colonic distention and depicted fewer respiratory artifacts compared with single-detector row CT. No significant differences in the depiction of polyps larger than 10 mm were demonstrated between single- and multi-detector row CT for a small number of polyps. Studies with a larger prevalence of clinically important polyps are needed for further evaluation of differences in polyp detection.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 465
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Multidetector-array CT: Once again, technology creates new opportunities
    Berland, LL
    Smith, JK
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1998, 209 (02) : 327 - 329
  • [2] CT colonography: Value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions
    Chen, SC
    Lu, DSK
    Hecht, JR
    Kadell, BM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (03) : 595 - 599
  • [3] CT colonography: Potential pitfalls and problem-solving techniques
    Fletcher, JG
    Johnson, CD
    MacCarty, RL
    Welch, TJ
    Reed, JE
    Hara, AK
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (05) : 1271 - 1278
  • [4] Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients
    Fletcher, JG
    Johnson, CD
    Welch, TJ
    MacCarty, RL
    Ahlquist, DA
    Reed, JE
    Harmsen, WS
    Wilson, LA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) : 704 - 711
  • [5] Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography
    Hara, AK
    Johnson, CD
    Reed, JE
    Ahlquist, DA
    Nelson, H
    Ehman, RL
    Harmsen, WS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) : 1181 - 1184
  • [6] Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: Initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity
    Hara, AK
    Johnson, CD
    Reed, JE
    Ahlquist, DA
    Nelson, H
    MacCarty, RL
    Harmsen, WS
    Ilstrup, DM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [7] Colorectal lesions: Evaluation with CT colography
    Hara, AK
    Johnson, CD
    Reed, JE
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 1997, 17 (05) : 1157 - 1167
  • [8] Multi-slice helical CT: Scan and reconstruction
    Hu, H
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (01) : 5 - 18
  • [9] McCollough CH, 1999, RADIOLOGY, V213P, P197
  • [10] Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system
    McCollough, CH
    Zink, FE
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) : 2223 - 2230