The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal

被引:11
作者
Niemeier, Matthias [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Vaughan V. W. [1 ]
Keough, Matthew [1 ]
Akbar, Nadine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Scarborough, ON M1C 1A4, Canada
[2] York Univ, Ctr Vis Res, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
关键词
spatial neglect; pseudoneglect; spatial attention; interhemispheric competition; lateralization;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-008-1438-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A fundamental question of attentional research concerns the perceptual consequences of attention. Spatial attention can enhance stimuli within the focus of attention relative to stimuli outside; or attention can remove the influence of distracting stimuli and other forms of external noise inside the focus of attention. It is known that both strategies apply depending on how attention is cued to a location in space. Here we asked which strategy applies in an uncued situation in which people show a spontaneous bias of attention to the left side. To measure bias, we used a gratingscales task with stimuli corrupted by pixel noise. If biased attention resulted in biased stimulus enhancement its effect should be largest when there is little noise or few distractors within the attended region, and bias should decline with increasing noise. If, however, bias caused distractors to be removed asymmetrically, larger bias should show up with noisy stimuli. We found that bias rose exponentially as noise increased, in agreement with the external noise removal model, and we found evidence that noise modified interhemispheric competition between attentional systems. Our data offer new insights into the neural mechanisms of the right-hemisphere dominance in spatial and attentional tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 420
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Feature-based integration of orientation signals in visual search [J].
Baldassi, S ;
Burr, DC .
VISION RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (10-12) :1293-1300
[2]   DISTINCT SYNDROMES OF HEMINEGLECT [J].
BINDER, J ;
MARSHALL, R ;
LAZAR, R ;
BENJAMIN, J ;
MOHR, JP .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 49 (11) :1187-1194
[3]   WHY IS THERE A LEFT SIDE UNDERESTIMATION IN ROD BISECTION [J].
BRADSHAW, JL ;
NATHAN, G ;
NETTLETON, NC ;
WILSON, L ;
PIERSON, J .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1987, 25 (04) :735-738
[4]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[5]   Putting attention on the line: Investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect [J].
Bultitude, Janet H. ;
Davies, Anne M. Aimola .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2006, 44 (10) :1849-1858
[6]   Covert attention affects the psychometric function of contrast sensitivity [J].
Cameron, EL ;
Tai, JC ;
Carrasco, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (08) :949-967
[7]   Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement [J].
Carrasco, M ;
Penpeci-Talgar, C ;
Eckstein, M .
VISION RESEARCH, 2000, 40 (10-12) :1203-1215
[8]   Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain [J].
Corbetta, M ;
Shulman, GL .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (03) :201-215
[9]   The noradrenergic α2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting [J].
Coull, JT ;
Nobre, AC ;
Frith, CD .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (01) :73-84
[10]   Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention [J].
Moore, Tirin ;
Zirnsak, Marc .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 :47-72