Eletriptan for the treatment of migraine in patients with previous poor response or tolerance to oral sumatriptan

被引:59
作者
Färkkilä, M
Olesen, J
Dahlöf, C
Stovner, LJ
ter Bruggen, JP
Rasmussen, S
Muirhead, N
Sikes, C
机构
[1] Helsinki Headache Ctr, Helsinki 00100, Finland
[2] KAS, Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Migranklin Goterborg, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Nevrol Avdeling RIT, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[6] Pfizer, New York, NY USA
关键词
efficacy; eletriptan; migraine; sumatriptan; triptan;
D O I
10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00554.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine the tolerability and efficacy of eletriptan in patients who had discontinued oral sumatriptan due to lack of efficacy or intolerable adverse events (AEs) during previous clinical treatment (not a controlled trial). Eletriptan is a potent, selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist with beneficial pharmacokinetic properties compared with sumatriptan. In a double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled multicentre study, patients with and without aura (n = 446) were randomized to 40 mg eletriptan (E40, n = 188), 80 mg eletriptan (E80, n = 171) or placebo (n = 87) for treatment of up to three migraine attacks. Two-hour headache response, based on first-dose, first-attack data, was 59% for eletriptan 40 mg, 70% for eletriptan 80 mg, and 30% for placebo (P < 0.0001 for both doses of eletriptan vs. PBO; P < 0.05 for E80 vs. E40). Onset of action was rapid, with 1-h headache response rates significantly superior for E40 and E80 vs. placebo (40%, 48%, 15%; P < 0.0005). Both E40 and E80 were significantly superior to placebo, based on first-dose, first-attack data, for 2-h pain-free response (35%, 42%, and 7%; P < 0.0001). Both E40 and E80 demonstrated significant consistency of response, with headache relief rates at 2 h on at least two of three attacks in 66% and 72% vs. 15% on placebo (P < 0.001). AEs were mild to moderate in severity and dose related. The most commonly reported AEs included nausea, vomiting, asthenia, and chest symptoms. E40 and E80 produce an effective response in patients who had previously discontinued treatment with sumatriptan due to lack of efficacy or side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 471
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   The impact of migraine - Epidemiology, risk factors, and co-morbidities [J].
Breslau, N ;
Rasmussen, BK .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (06) :S4-S12
[2]   Current and emerging second-generation triptans in acute migraine therapy: A comparative review [J].
Deleu, D ;
Hanssens, Y .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 40 (07) :687-700
[3]   Efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral eletriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine (Cafergot®) in the acute treatment of migraine:: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison [J].
Diener, HC ;
Jansen, JP ;
Reches, A ;
Pascual, J ;
Pitei, D ;
Steiner, TJ .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2002, 47 (02) :99-107
[4]   5-HT1 RECEPTORS IN MIGRAINE PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND TREATMENT [J].
FERRARI, MD ;
SAXENA, PR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1995, 2 (01) :5-21
[5]   THE CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND METABOLISM OF SUMATRIPTAN [J].
FOWLER, PA ;
LACEY, LF ;
THOMAS, M ;
KEENE, ON ;
TANNER, RJN ;
BABER, NS .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 1991, 31 (05) :291-294
[6]   Eletriptan in acute migraine: A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison to sumatriptan [J].
Goadsby, PJ ;
Ferrari, MD ;
Olesen, J ;
Stovner, LJ ;
Senard, JM ;
Jackson, NC ;
Poole, PH .
NEUROLOGY, 2000, 54 (01) :156-163
[7]  
LACEY LF, 1995, EUR J CLIN PHARMACOL, V47, P5438
[8]   Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II [J].
Lipton, RB ;
Stewart, WF ;
Diamond, S ;
Diamond, ML ;
Reed, M .
HEADACHE, 2001, 41 (07) :646-657
[9]   Treatment of nonresponders to oral sumatriptan with zolmitriptan and rizatriptan: A comparative open trial [J].
Mathew, NT ;
Kailasam, J ;
Gentry, P ;
Chernyshev, O .
HEADACHE, 2000, 40 (06) :464-465
[10]  
Millson D S, 2000, Expert Opin Pharmacother, V1, P391, DOI 10.1517/14656566.1.3.391